musoma dairy ltd under receivership 2 athers vs east african development bank another 2003 tzhccomd 33 27 august 2003
The arbitration clause in the Loan Agreement binds only PTA Bank and Musoma Dairy Ltd, not the majority of parties to the suit. Referring only those parties to arbitration would cause multiplicity of proceedings, risk inconsistent findings, and prejudice other parties. The petitioners' conduct does not demonstrate readiness to arbitrate. Therefore, the petition for stay and reference to arbitration is dismissed.
- Citation
- musoma dairy ltd under receivership 2 athers vs east african development bank another 2003 tzhccomd 33 27 august 2003
- Parties
- Petitioner/first Defendant: PTA Bank; Petitioner/fourth Defendant: Raphael Oyile; Respondent/first Plaintiff: Musoma Dairy Ltd (Under Receivership); Respondent/second Plaintiff: Dr. Gideon V. Mazara; Respondent/third Plaintiff: Jesier K. Mazara; Respondent/second Defendant: East African Development Bank; Respondent/third Defendant: Social Action Trust Fund
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Ruling on Reference to Arbitration (stay of Proceedings)
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Reference to Arbitration, Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreement Scope, Multiplicity of Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PTA Bank
Petitioner/first Defendant
Raphael Oyile
Petitioner/fourth Defendant
Musoma Dairy Ltd (Under Receivership)
Respondent/first Plaintiff
Dr. Gideon V. Mazara
Respondent/second Plaintiff
Jesier K. Mazara
Respondent/third Plaintiff
East African Development Bank
Respondent/second Defendant
Social Action Trust Fund
Respondent/third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Reference to Arbitration (stay of Proceedings)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings should be stayed and parties referred to arbitration under clause 16.2 of the Loan Agreement
- 2 Whether the arbitration clause covers all parties and disputes in the suit
- 3 Whether petitioners are ready and willing to arbitrate
Ratio Decidendi
The arbitration clause in the Loan Agreement binds only PTA Bank and Musoma Dairy Ltd, not the majority of parties to the suit. Referring only those parties to arbitration would cause multiplicity of proceedings, risk inconsistent findings, and prejudice other parties. The petitioners' conduct does not demonstrate readiness to arbitrate. Therefore, the petition for stay and reference to arbitration is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed with costs
Orders
- Petition for stay and reference to arbitration is dismissed
- Petitioners to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment