Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

REGISTRAR OF TITTLES SCANNED

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant's delay was due to technical reasons as he was pursuing his rights in a wrong forum, and the delay was not inordinate. Extension of time is therefore justified.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted fourteen days from the date of ruling to file the intended review
  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Madanio Ibrahim Saidi

Applicant Counsel: Mashaka Ngole

Registrar of Titles

1st Respondent Counsel: Mariam A. Matovolwa

Assistant Commissioner for Lands, Dar es Salaam Zone

2nd Respondent Counsel: Mariam A. Matovolwa

The Honorable Attorney General

3rd Respondent Counsel: Mariam A. Matovolwa

Amounts and remedies

  • Extension Period Granted (days): 14

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that the delay was technical, arising from pursuing recourse in a wrong forum (Misc. Land Application No. 11405 of 2024) which was eventually ruled res judicata.
Respondent
The respondents argued that the applicant failed to account for each day of delay between 30/04/2024 and 27/08/2024.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    High Court jurisprudence

    Technical delay may constitute sufficient cause for extension of time if the applicant was diligently pursuing a remedy in a wrong forum.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant's delay was due to technical reasons as he was pursuing his rights in a wrong forum, and the delay was not inordinate. Extension of time is therefore justified.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Applicant granted fourteen days from the date of ruling to file the intended review
  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 29 November 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 29 November 2024

REGISTRAR OF TITTLES SCANNED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. LAND APPLICATION NO. 22217 OF 2024 (Arising From Mise. Land Application No. 26317 of 2023 & 11405 of 2024, Land Division) MADANIO IBRAHAM SAIDI.................................................................. APPLICANT

VERSUS REGISTRAR OF TITLES................................................................ 1st RESPONDENT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOR LANDS DAR ES SALAAM ZONE................................................................. 2Nt> RESPONDENT THE HONORABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL........................................ 3rd RESPONDENT

RULING 22nd to 29th November, 2024 E.B. LUVANDA, J The Applicant is seeking extension of time to enable him apply for review of the decision of this Court in the above captioned matter. In the affidavit in support of the application, the Applicant pleaded technical delay in prosecuting Mise. Land Application No. 11405 of 2024 which was lodged on 17/05/2024, following the extension granted by this Court on 30/04/2024 vide Mise. Land Application No. 26317 of 2023 (which its ruling is subject for the intended review). i In the counter affidavit, sworn by Ms. Mariam A. Matovolwa learned State Attorney, stated that the Applicant failed to account for each day of delay from 30/04/2024 to 27/08/2024 when the Applicant filed this application. In the submission in chief, Mr. Mashaka Ngole learned Counsel for the Applicant adopted contents of the affidavit in support of the application. Ms. Mariam A. Matovolwa learned State Attorney for Respondents did not file a reply submission. Arguably on 30/04/2024 the Applicant was granted fourteen days to file the intended review, which order was made in Mise. Land Application No. 26317 of 2023. On 17/05/2024 the Applicant filed Mise. Land Application No. 11405 of 2024, which was determined on 16/08/2024 on account of being res-judicata. Twenty-two days later, to wit on 6/09/2024 the Applicant filed this application. To my view, this amount to

technical delay, where the Applicant was busy fighting for recourse in pursuit of her right to a wrong forum, to wit Mise. Land Application No. 11405 of 2024 which was wrongly filed with its eventuality of being ruled res-judicata. Therefore, the delay is not inordinate one. The Applicant is granted fourteen days to file the intended review, which will count from the date hereof. 2 The application is granted. No order as to costs. Ruling delivered in the Respondents. 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.