remmy keiya msuya vs gladness janson 2022 tzhc 160 15 february 2022
Applicant failed to adduce sufficient evidence and account for each day of delay; mere assertions unsupported by evidence are insufficient. Time limit starts from date of certification of judgment, and applicant was responsible to account for delay from expiry of appeal period to filing of application. No good reason for delay was established.
- Citation
- remmy keiya msuya vs gladness janson 2022 tzhc 160 15 february 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Remmy Keiya Msuya; Respondent: Gladness Janson
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Matrimonial Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Remmy Keiya Msuya
Applicant
Gladness Janson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient reasons for delay in filing appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to adduce sufficient evidence and account for each day of delay; mere assertions unsupported by evidence are insufficient. Time limit starts from date of certification of judgment, and applicant was responsible to account for delay from expiry of appeal period to filing of application. No good reason for delay was established.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for extension of time dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment