marando others vs mrema others 1999 tzhc 6 27 january 1999

marando others vs mrema others 1999 tzhc 6 27 january 1999

The court found that the removal of the Secretary General and National Chairman was not conducted in accordance with the party constitution, specifically regarding notice, attendance, and voting procedures, rendering the removal invalid.

Citation
marando others vs mrema others 1999 tzhc 6 27 january 1999
Parties
1st Plaintiff: Marando; 2nd Plaintiff: Kassim Haidar Magijto; 1st Defendant: Augustine Lyatonga Mrema; 2nd Defendant: Prince Mahinja Bagenda; 3rd Defendant: Harold Jaffu; 4th Defendant: Ndembwela Ngunangwa; 5th Defendant: Hamdun Marcel; 6th Defendant: Ramaha Rusupa; 7th Defendant: Wedi Kasakafyuka; 8th Defendant: Mahmoud Madenge
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
27 January 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Removal of Secretary General and National Chairman declared invalid.
Legal Topics
Removal of Party Officials, Party Constitution, Voting Rights
Source Language
English
Constitutional Law Political Parties Removal of Party Officials Party Constitution Voting Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marando

1st Plaintiff

Kassim Haidar Magijto

2nd Plaintiff

Augustine Lyatonga Mrema

1st Defendant

Prince Mahinja Bagenda

2nd Defendant

Harold Jaffu

3rd Defendant

Ndembwela Ngunangwa

4th Defendant

Hamdun Marcel

5th Defendant

Ramaha Rusupa

6th Defendant

Wedi Kasakafyuka

7th Defendant

Mahmoud Madenge

8th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the removal of the Secretary General and National Chairman was valid under the party constitution
  2. 2 Whether proper procedure was followed in the meeting regarding attendance and voting

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the removal of the Secretary General and National Chairman was not conducted in accordance with the party constitution, specifically regarding notice, attendance, and voting procedures, rendering the removal invalid.

Court Disposition

Removal of Secretary General and National Chairman declared invalid.

Orders

  • Reinstatement of the Secretary General and National Chairman
  • Defendants to pay costs of the suit