paul v benin communication 199 of 1997 2004 achpr 58 4 june 2004
The undue prolongation of the complainant's case before the Appeal Court of Cotonou constitutes a violation of Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter, as the right to be tried within a reasonable time was not respected.
- Citation
- paul v benin communication 199 of 1997 2004 achpr 58 4 june 2004
- Parties
- Complainant: Odjouoriby Cossi Paul; Respondent: Republic of Benin
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Complaint / Decision on Merits After Admissibility
- Outcome
- Violation found
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Trial, Right to Property, Access to Justice, Delay in Judicial Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Odjouoriby Cossi Paul
Complainant
Republic of Benin
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint / Decision on Merits After Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prolonged delay before the Appeal Court of Cotonou constitutes a violation of the right to be tried within a reasonable time under Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter
- 2 Whether the complainant's right to property under Article 14 of the African Charter was violated
Ratio Decidendi
The undue prolongation of the complainant's case before the Appeal Court of Cotonou constitutes a violation of Article 7(1)(d) of the African Charter, as the right to be tried within a reasonable time was not respected.
Court Disposition
Violation found
Orders
- Republic of Benin to ensure the complainant’s appeal is determined by the Court of Appeal as quickly as possible
- Republic of Benin to pay appropriate compensation for damages suffered by Mr Odjouoriby Cossi Paul due to the unduly prolonged proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment