muzerengwa and others v republic of zimbabwe communication 306 of 2005 2011 achpr 111 3 march 2011
The communication is inadmissible because the complainants failed to exhaust local remedies; domestic courts were not approached to rule on the substance of the eviction and alleged human rights violations, and prior proceedings were dismissed on technicalities rather than merits.
- Citation
- muzerengwa and others v republic of zimbabwe communication 306 of 2005 2011 achpr 111 3 march 2011
- Parties
- Complainant: Samuel T. Muzerengwa & 110 Others; Respondent: Republic of Zimbabwe
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 3 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Communication / Admissibility Decision
- Outcome
- inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Forced Eviction, Exhaustion of Local Remedies, Right to Housing, Right to Property, Administrative Remedies
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel T. Muzerengwa & 110 Others
Complainant
Republic of Zimbabwe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the eviction of Wakarambwa Village violated rights under the African Charter
- 2 Whether local remedies were exhausted before approaching the Commission
Ratio Decidendi
The communication is inadmissible because the complainants failed to exhaust local remedies; domestic courts were not approached to rule on the substance of the eviction and alleged human rights violations, and prior proceedings were dismissed on technicalities rather than merits.
Court Disposition
inadmissible
Orders
- Communication declared inadmissible for failure to comply with Article 56(5) and (6) of the African Charter.
- Notice of decision to be given to parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment