19770808 TZHC Mwanza
- Citation
- 19770808 TZHC Mwanza
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 8 August 1977
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 8 August 1977
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The convictions of the 1st and 3rd appellants were unsafe as they were based solely on uncorroborated accomplice evidence and misdirection regarding alibi; their appeals were allowed and convictions quashed. The 2nd appellant's conviction was upheld based on credible evidence of his involvement. The 4th appellant's conviction for theft was substituted with a conviction for receiving stolen property, as the evidence established knowing possession of stolen goods but not direct participation in the theft.
Court disposition
Appeals of 1st and 3rd appellants allowed; convictions quashed and sentences set aside. Appeal of 2nd appellant dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld. 4th appellant's conviction for theft quashed and substituted with conviction for receiving stolen property; sentence maintained.
Orders
- Convictions of 1st and 3rd appellants quashed; sentences set aside unless otherwise lawfully held.
- Conviction and sentence of 2nd appellant upheld.
- 4th appellant convicted of receiving stolen property under section 311(1) Penal Code; sentence maintained.
02
Material facts
Parties
Cosmas Lucas Tibaijlika
1st Appellant Counsel: Mr. KatembaNestory Buhamoka
4th Appellant Counsel: Mr. KatembaIdd Musa
3rd Appellant Counsel: Mr. KatembaCleophas Byashalila
2nd Appellant Counsel: Mr. KatembaRepublic
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Fimbo (State Attorney)Amounts and remedies
- Sentence for Convicted Appellants (years): 7
- Attempted Bribe Amount: Shillings 5,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the appellants were properly convicted of theft and/or receiving stolen railway goods in transit
- 02
Whether the trial court misdirected itself on the law regarding alibi and accomplice evidence
- 03
Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Appellants argued that the evidence against them was insufficient, that the trial court misapplied the law on alibi and accomplice evidence, and that their convictions were unsafe.
- Respondent
- The State argued that the evidence, including possession of stolen goods and witness testimony, was sufficient to support the convictions, and that the trial court properly evaluated the evidence.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 206 Criminal Procedure Code; R v Johnson (1961) QB 970
An accused is entitled to raise an alibi, and the burden of disproving it remains on the prosecution; adverse inference should not be drawn merely because an accused gives an unsworn statement.
- 02
R v Ndaria (1945) 12 EACA 64; Bannerman J in Wanyoike v Republic, HCCr App No. 332 of 1965
Evidence of accomplices given for the prosecution requires corroboration, but when given by a co-accused in defence, strict corroboration is not required, though such evidence must be scrutinized carefully.
- 03
Section 311(1) Penal Code; Idi s/o Wiziri v R (1961) EA 146; KJANGI NJOGE v R (1963) EA 624
Possession of recently stolen property raises a presumption of guilt unless satisfactorily explained.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The convictions of the 1st and 3rd appellants were unsafe as they were based solely on uncorroborated accomplice evidence and misdirection regarding alibi; their appeals were allowed and convictions quashed. The 2nd appellant's conviction was upheld based on credible evidence of his involvement. The 4th appellant's conviction for theft was substituted with a conviction for receiving stolen property, as the evidence established knowing possession of stolen goods but not direct participation in the theft.
Obiter and limits
- Trial courts must not draw adverse inferences from an accused's election to give an unsworn statement.
- Corroboration is not strictly required for accomplice evidence given by a co-accused in defence, but such evidence must be scrutinized.
Court disposition
Appeals of 1st and 3rd appellants allowed; convictions quashed and sentences set aside. Appeal of 2nd appellant dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld. 4th appellant's conviction for theft quashed and substituted with conviction for receiving stolen property; sentence maintained.
- Convictions of 1st and 3rd appellants quashed; sentences set aside unless otherwise lawfully held.
- Conviction and sentence of 2nd appellant upheld.
- 4th appellant convicted of receiving stolen property under section 311(1) Penal Code; sentence maintained.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 8 August 1977
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 8 August 1977
IN THE HIGH COURT OF T.:;Hz.-.Nlf; ,lT HiI:.Nz.~ _ ;iPPELI.,;iTE JUR ISD ICT10N - · . . -~-:~-- ,.- .__ :u1aii-cotiRTiGRD,i:ri1.,;pp:z.:111rn •. _152_ op .. 19n . •~ { ;;· '! :! :•. ~ I' " . '.t' .,. ,. · .•· ! . ·. . -~-£ ·• -~ ,, _;•.:.,·_.·~ . · . t. -. . ··; •· :, •··" ·r;_,; . · i:_··-. cf; ~~ ~iPPs., _ I:J0:•·1-59,, _·i5_1 &::129__ OF ·1977-:-~., ,. ~- -·-: •r ·•· . . . . .,o1 • · ~ _ _.. '.~,:·, T!:.._·~ • '-..;-,tt•·--·1 ,• ·:~ ~ . : - \.-r:,··. ~·· ~ 'r"·:_- ' -,. L • .• - •• • : .;: : ;OTI l_G)~--~•'.1-'. '{jfli-i.!.:'<"; L- ·Co., _.I!_; ••rJq •..905. 01•., ,19}:;, . ·· ·, · · .· .-: _ ' "· ~'A~: :1:uf AlS'il~UCT: .CC•~tir.·.:0_1f >1-~_~1}ri~. '.In s•j;~\lCJ: ;,£1~:J1:Nz/':- ._: . · · · ·· B~io~-~- ·,\. :ci' I~ciri-ii-,'E~q~t.Res~tlen~·-.1r~~¥iii'ti•:3'·te· ,. ·.-. ··.-. •.• ·• ? • • i, . . . .•, =~ .: .. - ~ ~ ; .. :1 :. ·: ·.: .:: ·,, f·-: 1 .• ···"'··~·-· •. ~ ~1·:~··r::r~ ·.- ::: , · · ~· . . , .;· . ~ :.. · .: :, j J :_.u ~rr a 1iL E ~ T ,. , : · .. . : r . -·. ;:; ).- . , ... . •••o:.• ,, r-: ;~~:• . ! .~::J- V •:• . ':? . •~,.: : :. ~-. ;., 1.:\,:t·F,.:i ~ • · l : ~ .;iJ~i;:;,_ ~•;:;: •, •~ j • ••, . \ ,J~.·;:: i: i :. :--· ... .._ . K:ATIT-I,.:J .• : •. •~· .· : .,..,. . ! .. l ~ ·~ .1 . . :;::.r;::::·: · :· ·. ,_.,:-- ·::;, .. <' .....:. ,"··,., :.. .:; ·:: ~ • ., ... , = .j · .. ; . I - .. ,· . . ·: ·.~s . • 1._;~~:..:;. •• ••• •; I : .... f· .... r,,.....
·...... :-.:.-::-;;:..· 'i· .. ::-~ :··;J·t. Fourteen a cc uscii 'pc'r'so'ini-; 1i1.l·c1 ud;ing .j;J1.e:. f-~IB'.;'~J:,p'~'it-a~Jt:s·i·..: wh9,; 11~.J?~;: Cosmas .Lucas Tibaijlika 1st, Nestory -£.uh-..:Jmefr~.·-Ath:·, C:).:e·o~ha:·s·:,13yadha··nP=~¼, Idd· _ltluso'·.,,7'--th- .2cb_-uscd 9,,,' M,~,r_e jointly ch.:::rced with the oifrcrd:fe :1:>:f:· sxea 1i_n'& Raihfay:..go·od-s. ·in .transit;' contro.r.y to· '.'s.cc,tion· -.269.(P) of. the Penal Code Cap 1fr.;0f ·ahe :I,i:;i..ws.·., )rf{e :f~ t:tr. nbove ::mert tio~e·ci:ia:gef~'j_''f'Jlrit's ·:werci ''found to have been---6n·.:th8' wr~ng side "the. h,H· guilty.:nnd-¢onyictcq.: o.~'·.=ch'.i'r'gad, and sen tcnccd tci .seven yu~r·s. :impr lsonmon t .. DC: ch,. while ..'. the :.:¥s s,> tent' were acqu5.:~-t€~~•~:~_4ggri~veU:; \fl•\_t6ur. are c.?±Wi?·;tions,- ~n~ . ·c1ppe2Nn~-"·ii.~<t~§.t:-: sen tenc~ s.u.ffer;J4. by-}hem_.. ,:,rhey .::r'c· 2 PPP.f 1J,n~·_;:y~1.~- ~F\th. -~~t Criminal appac1ls lfos.- 12_0;: 150·, 151 and 152 of 1971.r?:spe.G,:t.:1;.1ely', ·118'f,,nn to be con so lidc-t.sd~·::; .Clc;0.ph2 S.,:By2stia lila·, c·osm2 s.- .:Lucas· i(:i't:o· :·Ti b'a'ij-·uka, Idd Musa, ~ ~~ ~ • ..L ., •' and I·lesto.ry .Bµh."?.moka, w 111 ·_hcr'c in; -be 'r·8f~:r:r 41 i;.o., .t·s ''1st;; :2nd, 3rd and .... , • • : ,,I,. ; . '. :· • • • •• •• •• • ••• 4th appeH~nts~ :r~spactiv~l$."~~-- · ·., . · .. _·.:;~.:-.";. •A' ,; _·,:,; 1' ,.,. of;.
t.he. ·size. 'of· '·t~.c-- C,'l. s~.,' ..~~d tl;~ ··:l').Ul:1b:.;r . of c:ppeL..:mts; ?. .. l.i. s!n.::_v.ic~l conve-ni,.,J-n:o.ia: U•!,::,:;;':!m.i.'i:i,•. .'tiw.'t'...tt ca pit ul::i.t io.l'il..£. o,f _:t.he .. s:::vi.i~nci!:l'·n s :ci who le, ·re be undTer-trJ<.e.-n;~ ba:j:'pr-0 :rcis t•int,"· t:h;;: s=:.:1i1-.3.. ~:Vi:<L~nc,o· -f)/ 't~-J_i°·· c·ppei°lant' s inJ.i-v·'ii.tun:l -m~mo. of. ~:ipj{qnl~!·· The' facts .:1re, the:\ J;hc' ..::;:J..:1y l1ours of the 19 /9/1915·•; ::s~,w-i_t;li.i :~;rr i\t{!' .a.t M\i.:rnza ..S:01,rt)h .~1 ,of ·'t?·er 'lin-"i:::mza Bx press y/rt\, tratn.,:ifrorn Dar .:is. Sa).:5nil'' ···~.s ':his dutt ·do1~,;;nd.s of' 11.'irfii' PW8 ·Joseph l11agesa a Railway::watchm.'ln, wh;~e dt.ties: inclU(.lu~- tile ·ch0cki'iig':·thc· w2gons arriving, disccvercd.;.that .· ;.bgon. ·¢,!_a~r3~:.:rw~: 53002, .: 1].~d. a:rri-i6d\with this train-, th;i had be·en. br.oJcon opE;:i.n• "'Ek:rut1ny·by·PW1O John Mos,µ.u; the·;off-loading clerk, and PWll B.84.~J.P/C :•!'~:~·?.?~:?f,;.R~ilw~,:y- .P.o.l).~,; 1~~;~? th~·:·~'~scovery of the fact, th.~~ ..q~;i.te,.ic1 numb;:;r of ·go·ods•.or-:·,9'°'.trs1gnrn.0n.ts, had--·been stolen therefro:ni.,,,, .. ".,_- :i. !.i • f ··., . : / ;, ;-<,.·, . . --~ . :::-:;~:.:.""- .. ~;. 0 . =- · .,· . . . ".~<- · · · ·, ... ~- , ... : • ... . ._..: • ..... _. . . . ·... .. :' . .: .. •.: ~. . . • This very .w?goii, ·had 'been loaded·.- w.i,.th
50;0.d.s, at "llala eoods shed, ., .. ,.. , ~der !he super.vision 6f"i?W6 -.~len '·MwinyijQ.m.~• ...~th~_.,g6~d~"loaded therent, '~: , · '/ had:··bcen.:re-cei ved::PY· PW5. Mi~hael Mrogo, whose :1 uty.. i t··w~ s· ·~o receive goods . :-;,~. !·froh{·cohs-ignors:.- The:.good_ifinter alia SOJ.-l~at.i.ed, we.re.(l) :50 packages • ·•.·. : .. _·: ,! of' cott.o.n, wool, rnea.n)t: f6r:., Jiifnnza Medi-ct-.rL.!3-:to.:r~·~ {,:i_d.e Consi:gnlil~t t '·"--:· ~:·~·~ 1io1/: '(cjN}: :7394·5 of'.. i2j.9,/(5 ,, ·(2} .Bfoyo10· ,-tu):2..3.~ iPh.a\npsi &' :-son.si•f,or the :t:ir2:m - .,.~ .;:. _~·: ·; : -~:}h::~ '~!:! ;!<T!:! ;·~11~~!~!1;;;~J~f ·~;~i.¢~i ~4yc?~J~1;,'!~~~r~~{~;:i~ 1 3 1 .,; · ... 'yide~ejN';lJO. 73934 of:"12/9/75-;' f6)'_3 ·panc~s of_,c~p-t.ti\n"{f.'11!ifter'fals··f11:01J1: :·: .. · ·:•· .Ka~saih :9Yi.aramsi Dar t\?i:< sc:1·faGI11 :vide ::c/n 73439 ef ~2}9]15~. ~(7} J· cart0ns , - _· ·9f'.shii>ts for' s·. R.. :1;3hat,t~:,.~ Sons Mwarizri. vid.e .c/n 71~5? 6f J.-3/9/75~ :'(8) · ~-,.· .· · ·two .. caa~t:o,n.s ..of .s:1ir~¥-,_·: :foi;-; ~: 'y. · si".iriann.:i11w.~J1:~n _vlcte c/ri. 73953 1.3/9/75, cf . ...· .·,.,. · ,(-9): ·2 -CBr-;tons· o.f s:i~r,ts, ;for. 1{.; J•iwnn· r:IWL\n'Ztl.. vi_d,~. c/n; J3.954-. -of 13/9/15, - .:· " · · ·(10}· Tvio. c::!r.t.on:s·. o.f;i·;frt~• ·ro-r· J~' ff~··'Kdtoc-h3. f4ympiiC;:l!i~e b/h· ifo,117'3B55 " .:·· ·.'\of' 1-3/9/75·,. :(1:1). pne.. cartc5;!?:·::0f
S~-•irt·s ,£or :.B.,.Jirla l 1i:,'.7;._;qz.<1 vid·.e· c/n ·N:o._1m:r ''· •. ··'_bf-13/9/75 1 (12}> q:~f-t_o:1_: ,:JJ.s ~s.!frt-s '.f11r: :R~ V--., ~f~vi::-Ji'1{~,i>-·i1~~ ,/icle·-'b:/n· ·•'.-- ·· "l;d·.- 7-395'.),. ,:nd;·, 9~_:co::f.~-~~rftion -''6y_;_F;+6 ~he ~J,:'0::iti;i-iJ...pr~d -\~;~~t"f6_~~ng.,.cJe!k, ··•·•···•~. . . ,• . . - ·. _,•• ,~ ..:~:--t.'"·:~•~<2<1 ;·· .... -':.:.,, ... ·.- . • 1~ • - } ~· • • • • 2 the finding -tpa :t,, inter', alia, thd; r: ~o.ve. were-·-lo:ade d in .viagon C-C.B 53002 cannot be avoid-3<;1.. F."urther~ tg.a.:t:..:~t.h.cr.::very ,~ag:on Llf.:t.. Jwr es Salcia:n, well se~led and in tac,, _on the 14/9/75, is -confir11ed by Pi'J 7· Ali Kcdongo a Train guar<i, who WE\S h~nded over the train guarding du-t.y, c.:"i T'.'1bora.. Pw 7 further confir11s, that upl.to .BJlkw_j:nb_a_, .,!}:9_._wagon ·h."'d_ been· ~n_t~rfenod with, only to discover one .wagon broken op~n on .r·,-;i:iching ·111w..,iiza·. -11'-he···tibove findings of fao~,. as also found, by the _learn<.icl trial ""1agistr:.itc, defy any dispute or .· :~h~ltf1g_~;:_: .. ··: ·._-.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .· . The inves·t.ig.:1tions 1 ·11ounted ..i;t1·-·over·-'t'rie·p1acz, 1 ·ir1itiall·;y led to no__ clue.. It was Pw 20 :.j3.. 1916 Detective Corporal Julius, who on thtJ '.Nay, to o·r. :f-ro:n 'Lrnt,are. 1 ,and• along, tnG . railway. l'in<:!, . "\.o.~,. pi_cked_ five cotton wool _ bundles,
sc2tt·e:l"~d along ·-the. frnilwa;y line.· It w~s however 11ainly, the ~u.ri -curiousity of Pv; l~_Hebekc: "1ir1;::nbe, a '1'.A-lm ward ~.x.ecutive Secretar·y ·of ~ikuy-µni, the;:t'led to the prosecution_o~, and today, these appeals by the appellants. ~y position, in this·: case, does not afford :ne, a _platfqr11 ·to· do. -anythi.ng•in;praise-of,hu,-amd L:fe1;,l'.to.s9rew.:ny oo\li'i;ige., .to.:~-.--. acquire the liberty of doing so, lest I an ~ccused of i~~i6~e~ partiality. However, it is .a .feet, -well foµrid tiy-. ih..e.. tI'.ial. court, that in the ·. 19/9/75~ while hi 12 Rebeka 'hrenbe was on the Part;)' erran~-~• ..-s.he .. . 11_0tning of was attractEd by the -unusual nu11ber: of Taxis, at the house of i:1--'th-...a.c·c.:us-~ - 4th appella.nt, and by an .Asian,. w_ho wa.~ cc:q:-rying twines and sac):<s,· and running about, looking worried and urisefi-1...e~cf; Rebek~. ,vrir.e_11be· •w:erit to the scene, and, what transpired and she s·aw, '02.n 6?).ly be ·_appreciltici., if heard fro11 her_ own 11outh, and I quote her=~ .. . 1 ·.; . . .;: . !. ·. 1 ... 11 1· · · · · · ·:.t saw N~ story. :(4th .appellant) and Sosolisq '( 3rd accuse_d) . . : ,-·.;·. T ·1oading·a sa·ck in the·taxi .. l a_sked Sosolisc/what·was i1;._:_ i.J Sdsol:iso - tqlg., 11e· it was· the prope;rty of the ·o,wner of the ·• ,! ···· ··house ~.:'(Nestory)~ . I asked N.estory what'it ,was~: He saidi, .
\·;it•::waehis prop~rty;· he .W.:1S_.t<:1king·it ·outto sell.• · ,~t:· _·,·_ ,:': ... . ·.:•. :~ilJs·ti_oned ni11 to.open the sack; to ·se"' ·what it was'-'in:the·_·, . . . : . ~,···.·.-·o~g.=:- ..1~e·story .re-fused to aUow 11e to open the- _bcig. · 'l'll-ey . ; · went ·on .. loading the taxi with :other .·bc::gs:~. l · saw 8· of· ::tte:n.. l sent -:ny assistant to go to ring th~ Police. . ,· · \iihen Sosoliso he·.ard this,· he off-loaded. 'th~ btigs. ·.Later· _:,·-;. _,;, -·the accusi:!d ,l:,lo~ 3 and .No. 4"';;.r.tered ' ., . . th.-e house.and'.,,called :. \. . .. . '. . . . · 11e~ ·They told 118 to accept 'Tloney. 'Ihey sho~l.;;d :n.:: ihti· · 'Tloney, which was in tundlGs. It •was in °i1U.n.drecf shill:\.nta notes.•· 1 es~i:nat-~d. it ,to bG Shs.-_ 5,0..00/=• I :refused::to accept the ~oney. when I r~fused 1 Sosoliso w~lked •out, -~Ld ran ;;,wc;y wit:h his taxi. 1-lfte~, a short.vmi'le, i"he Police .... .appe~red .:nd_ .found t_h1a 8 bags outsid.e te_:S:tol'y 1 s roo:n,. _- _.. · • • -~ ••••.•••• .,;,Bef.ore, we r.::c:q.i:l~q .:th:J hou¥:·};her-3 were ;thre·e . r.olls o;f clo·:th .pu;tsidt3 t~;e__ ~puse~.. 'IJ:l,~Y. ;~~re for f<2 nale s · · and W(lr<:! printed in d;if:Le;rent col.ours. Before the · l. Polio,;; ca.11.~, r-u~he~ ~~_<_;ny of.f_i:;e,_.a,.i-i( ~;;i.{cd the· hard . . . ·'" - :· ·._::ch:.:1ir"llcm'· o.f;- TAhll. '1~uyuni1~· ~ ~he _.Qh-,;,~X1"0P~ c.~l.l:ed the. '
... .. -::Y ".-;· \:·.:, .. -; Putiiic to Qring a, Je-J:id.~er - - ~r.e q"li::nbe4. ·_µp -~o ce1l,ing,• .,'.,.; .: Th!=re. wel'e .3 rolls-of-.cloth _and :nany ..enpty case-a. _of._.·. shirts., about 90.- ~f'he public r.e'I\Q~ed· th;-s<.: c:npty · ·•.. •·,. · cases and the rolls of cloth outside Ne story's house~--"··-· _ t_. -fie beka '1ire·-~be, Ja bl s· _f O\.\lld .to b~ .a: ·wi tn_:: S$ _of 'uni 11pe_~,~-.h~·:a ci: :che;ra c_te rt :-. _an---hone s:t wo11an. wit!\ :iron spirit, _and _u,.n_susceJ>iiblP.· to c.o:r;.rupt. at.tra-ctions- On :_11y par~,- I ·a11 ·sati1?fied, th2i:t riot even ~he extr·.:-,ie·: do'u!:!·fang ·sp~cies-:·of !flan, br'; Tho:nas type,· would :defy this finc3_.ing ·of. :fo ct·. . Rebeka ··~i"re nbe_•--s·. tfsti '!lony, :.w~-s :·a;lao s~pport.e,d .-·by .P. \if;. 13 Kaslizo W~ni1:iuz3; ·a ten_ont in t.he very ho·use, who. :began wi tne ssirtg tha activities r12gsr~hng. _'the sa11e·, r.ight fron 6 a~.'"•, the ti_:ne,:-she·woke up, .r.a-n_q~~te satisfi•-~d, :::nd--happy .. to:_.c~mcur~ -~i'th the trial J::earne? ~agistrate·, -that.what :PW 12 ar,d.:Prll3 testif-iad: _9 bout.,· were-•found in ·- -- ~_he p:oss@,ssion 0 1L :ttie. 4th !3ppellant •. P$:rt.JculerfsGd, the ·evi·aence· of_:PvJl 7 -·_,.,_,-B~·~-31~ P~·c, :o.fortin anµ P.vi20,:!3~l916_D~t-ect-iye ·ccrporal-:Juliu;s who . ca:ne.'-to the _sce·ne .·as -a -res,ul t of :Fiepeka. "fi:J'.'e11..be. sho_WS;t-·
thit._ the .ii't appeiLrnt" hc1d in his t ·. :-'pos.s1fs!h:6i1: Ex·hi.~bi t :5, 6 1 . and :12.:· (:1-44 .:b~cycl:e tupe.s, Dhanant- a~d Di~11ond type), Exhibits 8, 13 45-·tK<0"ft~t.~~-t.sJ ·Ex:hib-iti;; 9;.10-;;-(26 rolls' of "khaki)• ·Exhibit 11 (Six rolls of ~011en cloth~ Exhibit 13 of Kent Shirts of 2775 brc1nd.or type and Exhibit_ ],ij Kent Shir_t cover· pieces (bUl'nt)~: :All tllese it:e'Tls we.re new. __ _j ~- •·-~ 3 It is here, t1.c:t I consider it conv,,mient to stop, and launch a relevant question - werE:: thesG guods pc:.rt of tn;.; goods consigned to , :..twanz& through the fic:ilways anci subsequently round stolen fro'll tho Wi:lgon, and how do ;.ie know? It is Vf!.ry crucial tr.c.t W'! know, thc.t tne goods were , consigned through th-2 r,.ilwbys, c:.nd stclen ;...s c.t.Lrg·2d in which cuse we will have to know) how the appell::.r.t c::.'ll•:.' by-th.::"11..· ·The prosecution hc.1s ell_,_ along ncintciined, that the gcods s~ized were the prop~rty consigned through the R..:.ilways; but subse,1u:::ntly stolen ir. transit. 'fh1s poses . a que_stion of identific:;;tfon, ..:.n ssp'.:!ct, th:..t :::ttr,.-,ctcd ric :.ttention 9f :the Counsel;. ··for the 1st ·nppdlunt, "'nd ev1.:r, the lei,;rned St;;;t.e P.ttorney, on ·app•2·2l~ I sh2.ll avoid, such ::.· co11pL.c::nt "'pprc:::ch en tnis ~spect. -· · However in. cc.ses of this kind, wr.2re consignors h::;v·1 tri:d'~
relations, ,with consign''" cs· and consign good·s ori orders,: the ccnsigne•~ s n;.;y h;;.ve diffi6ui ty, in physio·ilty id•entifying the l'i~·rchandise consigned, unless reference . to invoices ·and ccnsign"llent.no1es; are of help. _·Sinilarly the consignors, : ~ay- be suc_h geographically pleced, ::s tc- 'llak;;"tn<:ir attendance_ to identify ·the· goods· difficul-t, expensive or involve a lot of deL:.y. Cert·dnly,. while I· 6ann6t swear, thc:.t oonsignc.:;s ci.nnct id~ntify th:: 'nerchun•dise oonsign~id to the'll apart fro'll their c~pacity to give a gen2r~l d~•cription the corisignors occupy a better ·position to do so. I have nevertheless to consider the issue of identifi~~tion • On thi:s respect, we have. Vi/I V.S. ·cha"llpsi of Dar es SaL:10"!1 testifying thi:lt he consigned ''Dhtnant c:.,nd Durilop" bicycle tubes to Popat., ar,d 1 ident1fied these ·s~ized at the 4th:~ppellant's place,· to be like the··6nes • he seni. -~W2 iziz Derap Singh did the sa'll~, in rispect of 179 khbki :drili :found at the 4th c:..pi:,dlant•a plc.ce, and so did Pvd B•K• Pattan .. in resp~_~t; · oi. ·13 rolls of. P,iyster Sh{rtimg 'llc.,terial - the _-invoice and. c/a No. No. 73940 being Exhibit 37 • . As for other witnesses, it is only consignees that tf!.stified·in atte'llpt to identify the go-0dst th~t they n~ver received by_tendcring order~, invoices and correspondeLc~s betwe~n then ~nd
the consign~\r~. Having exc111ined the sc docu'll~nta:ry· exhibits te1 .. dered in Uis case, I found~ .they• werc'"invofces, lettbs :rnd·.ordersf -tu~t nae: pcis.eed b.etwa,m the aons·i.ghe.ti.j:J and consignors,, arid 'Tly-fear waa, in particular,· as r;spects thE;' consignors who did not give evidenc·e, that such docu'ller.ts wer.". _{nad.'Tl'issible. unle.ss ·the·re" ~as 1!ateri'al, entitling the_ trial vragistrat1: ·to· apply, the provi'aions of° Sec:tfon 34(b) of tr.e· Evidence iict 1967 ._, that allows. or p;;rni·ts~· the ad~:i.ssibi1ity of sta'te'll;nts,. ·written o'r otherwise, nadc in the ordinary course of busin'2ss, by persons who cannot be call-:d ae witness.- Hoving exa11ined the "r,'.:·c·ord; .· I _an, satisfied thot tt,rJ trial '\llagistr,:ite in ad'lli tt-ing the said docu11enta·ry exhibits-, did not stop to appr<:ciate the cohd.,i.tions fo·r· their a~11i~~ib{iitj; under the provisions of Section 34(b) of· the. Evidence Act 1967. H6weve~t oral evidenc2 fro'TI consignees was sue~ that no prejudice· had be ,n occasiohed, by ·the·· i 'llprop,,r c1d11ission of each docu11ents. 1 would however sa~ tha-t·i wh:::rc consignors cam,ot be? obtclined, the consignees who had plac~d ordeis for the goodst that wcr~ sub~eqciently stolP.n, are entitled to give-oral direct evid.ence, of t11-e orders they had 11ade in Dar es Salaa~. and could even refresh thei~ 11ind~, bt
referring to oorresponcenc~s and inVoices:betwicn the~ and the consignors, to identify the goods• they would but foi thef"t rc.?oei<Je, Ir.. '-'!0EJ;·,;~D 1I'P.KI Vs. ii~ (1961) EA 206, in which the qqestion of identificatioL of inported, but stolen watches arose, ~nd in which tae ·exportets (coniignors) could not ~ive ev.idenca fro~ Switzerland, bLd wh~re provisions equiv~lE~t to Section 34(bJ above were ·applied, the Court... at puge 213 observ-2d, ar.d I quote:- . - "Tne cddre·s$i:s were_ f'un;y enti'tl!.!d ~c give . , eviaer.ce of_ orders~•. wr.;.ich. th::y h£td plciced ih Switzerland, ·aud_ to r~fresh their nenories :..before hand, .b'Y c9nsul-ting their 'files of corresponder.ce f::nJ invoic::s, wilet11er ·t11ese . docU'TlGhts were put ii1 hvidcr,ce. o'r not".· The significan-ce of tue· above cc:.~e~· v,ould not ci"'nge. ·sinply becciuse, · in the csse (supra), the go6ds were .bo'Tlin~ fr~n. ~witzerla~d.· It follows,· that kh0re th~ consignor. c&nnot, p~ obt~inc~ t6 f~Ve evid~nce of idcniificc..tion of th:; goods ·consigr.:.i:.:d, the: consign-:~ cc:.n so do•:· through oral '-'Vi.:Lnc-:; 1 by ·r·ii?r ·. shin& his- ·-:l<~ "'lor'y by r'2f ·; re Lee t:o' invoices received·, -~,. ., "'· . ·; • •.• .• • .• 4 ..... ,.... ' '.•.· by ref:re: s!!ing '11ado ..,. by . hi11,., .. -· .. ,: • ~ • -. • • . . . .-. • •. '-?l •' . Th;e trial \\iagistrc.te; "!e,;s tn,crffor.e HititJ0d· to
he.:,r ttic consie;nees .. ·of the· 'propsrty --- Pw23 Ch::ind1:i.1],c.1l )<;bJ..f _ri_· . who ··through. ir:voic~ s ond. .c/note ___ ,, d~ted 12/9/;5,Ex'J:i, 23: 24 ~.'101:.._,d ht; h:...d cir_d'er-:d for ,\.mt' sl:irts bl'bna.:. No. 2775; but never got any_ .::..ltµough lie 1·ec(;iT.:d consigr!':i11ent _note .. dateq 1·2/9/75" ·pw6 Jay;.·r1.dr:-:. .Bhi11ji; h:o.d ~1.so. oro.ir_,ic. IC:mt' shiI:ts br·~_ri_d No. 2775 ,11.de invoii,,'" E:x.'h. ··25 1: but n,J_v,;r 5 ot. ·;;;ny; lll°tho·u.e:h he· receive'ci ~/n~te No, 7395'7" H.27 ,"_b-;,ii:'c.l. S,,Ro Hhcdj._a/ ·:haJ -~~rcfo:,·:~d _Kt:nt shirts ... ·, 'l:i"rand 2775:- whj_~h 'i:i" ·ri_::.,1::-:r get: d.'.:.spi te his in110L.-: s ·::-;o.: 178J and :consJgn-nent .. Note Non 73952 _Exb.,. ~.S: p;~29 ir.,;...'. 'Popat g·ot or~iy _5_:_bales of bi~n~et.s, ·:while ·.•·· 10 ha'2i.' bee-n.consign-.~d 6S shc'wn-by.th·" invofce'-a1.d''c0n.sign-nen,t ,n-o{e ,Jx_h~ 29 '(., 'pw.30 Ki shore' K .. Kot,, ch.:; g·<;i't :r,t_O K_,:i'.nt sin;.' t's of 27.7 5: Ji/i.iid·, Q,i th9u.g_h ':iie'" ', r<2ceived invoice' '.a'na:· CQnsj_.gn·,irni ·note . .Ext_, 30.a ·Pv, J1. },i,ric;n'shi S::::i'nj:iq.i,d; got> not a singl_e shiJ.;t c·f Ke·n:t .~. 2775 bJ:'::.:nd 1 cJl tl1ough· ·he go{ ttie· i,rivcifq.e ·_1;1nd.co.nsign11entno.e ·Exhs. 31, .i:\n<l _Pv140 Henry "IJTad.0110,go\.o,nly 4.5 pack'ages, ..· .·!3.1,t:hough the consignr,ent ncite aricf cc,py of th.e
co-n.ine'a. ..R;Jgui'?i t_fon, she>\~ -· ·11.'e··shoul.d-·hcive .r.eceived 50 pack~gc;sn . . -~ .- , -'.. . ~ \ .•• t • ... • • • . • . . • ---viith.-tn-e ,above it-·,mst •be recc..llG:d,' that in th-.:: i:,os.s~ssion of tl,e · appellant No~ 4 1 were 11cny Ki:nt shi-1·ts: so112 of :2775 br-and~ He ·had also, khaki drills rolls: cf consid,2rcble quc.:nti ties, ::.1nd bicycle tubes ,,,,lof..i.Dha'liarft and DunJ.0p type.i not- inconsicte:ra-ble in a,11ount. • .1'111 -relcded to ths -<::vide1ice gi'ven arid t1.Jking t·hc consigm1e·n:t note I s descriptions .. e:,'f pr-ciperty., I a1i l:eft witri ·no doubt, th3t -foe goods found at the .. ·home: of 4't-h--a1,pellanti · were ·so,11B ,of the consi 6 n11en·-ts, tn::.:t were st·ole·n ·:as a ..·: re suit ·of b"r"r~ak.ing· op':!n wagon Q.,G,.,Bo, he fore -th.e 11orning of 19/9/75-• ... ' ..-.. , .,· .. ~·; Ii,, jis·v-e:r;_;y,'~i.ife to -coriclud•=,•'i.:f-S ciid the tr'ilil ~~ugistr"'tc, thi::<,t·the · .,i. appellant'.No~ 4, W8S .fcund in possession of :f?rc5pu'1:'-ty- stolt:n in trcinsi-t·.- 0 ,::The· 4th appellc,nt:: hci;e- b..:: ':n e ccn traf.:- f:i 6 ur,:r-in ·this -cas'.:, · b-t:: co use ,,\'L:--of- th~-pI''o'.I)e·rti-es f-c,un·ct -:On- .i:iin·.. 'l'ht., ist and :J:rd, --2:nd-e·ppdi'u:its, \•i'e-r'e·-- -ri'entti-cned .tO:,'the Fo1ice. by th-23rd-& l,t'h acclis•2d··a•nd·h<:?i'l-C€ ·their·t/rr·es:t. ··Fo~,, ,the•· f"i1-s ti _.:md.
3I'<l :~ppt:!11:.:r,t s 7 ths orily 2 vide'r" c:: · we hc;v e -is fro11· the ·.• ·-311tl••cihd '-4th ·accuse·d; 'l'ht! 3rd •i;:,.-cc'u·sed :wc.,;s a· ·co--iacclisc·d' sub·sequen·ify : .:·. ;_,~.·acq;u:i:t.t-:id;..: .. The 4th ·"&ccus!:!-d :i:i:f .·fh'i-3 4th a-ppell6;_, t: in· this ,c.;s~~-· ~- ·It is· the -3:rd .a-ccuse-d:s--e-vidtcrrce-:ti1c·t i11plic&tes th;;:rn, j·us·t as ·aoss the :,,,: ·-E.vi:-d:e'hce -tif ,th-e 4th appell'c,nt~· The 3rd c:ccu.se·,i' a· ·Taxi c}r'iver' now· acq:ui,tt'e,tr/· t.old the G()ur t .in ·his s-wor:n- def"·n·ce·: as foll'ows·':_, 11 1 r<211e11bsx U was in the night' of 19/9/75 · .--! •• betw~-n- 4.JO ·and 5 a.11. T w~~ ~eie~p at hone.· .I ·he~rd scn~bo6y kno,king at 11y ~indo~ I he~~d· sbne one· "S0S0LISO' l: 'IFT.l<:J;, '~i-'ni Zolo,. H.... '~HH. k\iha k~zV·. Because 1 I know Zolo I-wok~ up a'nd!open\id the·· door·o -I saw· Zolb bu:tside .. · He wr--s ·with 'two persons: Cos11c:s Kc.to 1st accus~d" •••• and Idd ,: (7th'""ccused)" - Zola's taxi· w·as outside. i·Zolo told ne that trierc was so=he·job t'c be dor1ei ·and · -- that h€ hi:id don-~· his trips, but· unfc:rtu.nc:itely · :t;he ,exh:mst pipe of his nutor vehich, h:!..'d broken ..'.' down. So: he- asked:ne tc do til-;! :·job. I asked Zolo wne=tricr•th~ •job was il di'.:1-gerous on·e, he :answered in-the ~eg6tive. The owner~ of.the ·gcods~ to be cc.tridd ~t tft~t ti11s were Cos:n&s k~to
and Idd Ins~~ ;r:weht b~ck·td jy hous~ to pttt on :ny clotneso Ther~~they tol~ 11e t6· t&ke than.to 1 1kohnL . 2clo ,L:ft ·with us, bu.t in his vehicle &nd he went )io11e~- Ou.r·sGlves· procLdG,d to 1'1kchni. vihen-'J ·re.:.c.a;!d 11Ik0Lni? i fow-~d two pBrs;ns m,:nely the 2nd ;,;ce;u.s,d, ·no now pr,o~~r;t_ in Co.u.r't,· und CLop.l:1as ·Byc.sl1&~ila · 6th ucl,.us.E:d;_ . 'lhe_y we.re standing near' the rciad si.d~, .c.nc.i on. the .ground .I. saw clotn.;s. IJ:'h-i:y ·s't.&r.ted to ··10~,d. thi1,gs in :ny .11ctor vehicle .• Yiy 11oto:.: v~i1icle is snL.11. ari.d coula not, carry: all ···of the·n .=it a go_:· · f.:1:U: I drc•;e Cosm.s KcJto c..nd Idd ~usa togiiD~r w~tQ ins goods t6 'town l~iving, the ..·.. . /5 • • l .a • • 5 .2nd accusect·\not in Court) c:,nJ tt1e 6th accu.sed at the sa-ne, place. vilien WE r~2>ci1ed '1kuyuni they tcld ~e to bri~g ioods"to one Nestcri 4th accused. ~'2 woke I~-astci-ry ,mu st,.rted to ur.lo::,j .{c.a gooc!.s. 'Ihe' 1st accu.se·d ctnd :7th ,iccuseG: a.sk,:i n•i tc rcturr.. theTl to \lfkolar.i, tc collec.t tn2 ·r'::"1oL,in. tl::.i1:..1::s in ths 'Tloto:r v;;•nicl•.o. This W6S tr.2 fiL"'l trip and £>11 acci...se~ p~rscns~ h~'1ely the first ~cc~sed 1 2nd accused, 6tn acci...s" ·aua.' 7th bcc .... s-::c, er.t-.:r,/j t.r,2 11otcr vehicle . ; aad drove tot~~ s~"'le place at ~estory's house •···•• ,,f te r that t.r.e y a sb-, d ,Jc to taKo:: t.ne "1
,::.en::." The 4th ·2ppe llc.rit,. whil1:: :not 'to'ticr'i.i.;:.g tne _ plcic~ 1 "the go·ods could have •o-rie· fro11, 11aintaine.J ·fn.::,t· tlle ;,:::LJ. cppelL.!i-t Co.sri2s L,to, 3ra. i:lCcused, w.hoke hi'll up ot 5.30 anJ. told hi''Tl, t.:..'-.t. tr,.e;;: r1 .... 0. cL.,t1.es, c.rd bicycle tubes tncit j.,:;.~y wuLt'3d to k2•.. p ..:.this ho-.,..,s~, p,;;Lcl:~n;~ tri:.nsportc,,:hon el~ewhers. He'suid- ne allowe·c::. ti-1e'D •. 'l'r1r·.:,; trips WJrt;; 'Deia.e, c.i.1.ct ti"1at the 3rd accused, lat 2r told··f1i11 thc:t the goods still in tht: ccir, were 0 for the 1st ;;a.d 2nd c:.ccused (lddi \fusa, "'.r~d Byashi...lila (6th accused - 1st appell.cm t) .. I,t is now, tnat I se·t off to consid,:r tne c;;se ,-,s a whole as touches each appellant. It behovcis 'llG ~o do this, in vi2w of the overwhel'Tling signs, that each accused, W,:.s tryir"t:- to throw tl1'2 1:il:...11,:: to the other, and trying to 'Tl;;iroon ec..c'h otl1;:.:r _&t a very L.te h0ur.,_ " The first appellaLt, •is ciiicp.ti.;is By&shalih in Cri'Tlinal /ippeal No. 120/19.77. His defP.ric·';;; Couns-?1 1 is. l'=arr;;,d ·~r. ~~ats11b:..:. The lat appellant, -t.old the ·court tr;.,d on d<.1tei charged, h: WciS on duty h"'ving reported on duty at 6 p.'Tl. Hi:! said; L-i:1t his ·duty_ wc::s to rGcord ~11, the inco11ing rail wagons :u;,d those lying Ed. t.iu1: P6rj; ( Twanza South). · He said, _this job is don..:: be
ti·J'>"n 6 Po 11. c.nci. 8 · .... -ii. Hs s~id 11e. did his job, till he sub11i tted his report 6 p. 'Tl .. '"t 8 i. n. . His defence witness Tit~s Rwes?ngira sort of confir11ed the job tn_t t~e appellant was doing and thought the c:ppelLrnt 11us"G lki'"' doDe J:-.is job p:~c;p:'!rly, i:.iS he reqeived no co11plaints+ altho~~h he did nots~~ tha 1st dppell~nt 6ri iriat dLly. The trisl ~~gistr~te beli~v~j tne story by the 3rd accused; 4th appellar.t 1 1:ind re~,cted tLe ~ppelldnt's ,jlibi ~Da convicted hi'Tl~ First 7 the first steppi~t·~torie, th~t l~d t~i trial ~~gi£tr~te into CJ rejc:ction of tne 1st .. pp_·lL. nt's J::f-:.:uc·.-, i!.~:5 b2c,..U:se'; l think- tne 1st 1:ippell;:.rJ.t <2lectec1. to ·n,,::.:.: ;:,:.n ut;swcrn st .... t-,n2Lt, c.ft"'r the ad.11inistrt.tion of section 206, of tne Cri'Tlinol r'l'CC'2dUr2 Ce.de. 'lhe tii~l 11agistri;Jte ~tt~cks tte ~Pr~11~nt, thus: "I woulJ · tnink p:3rsoL2.illy, tr1c..t c: ·trutJJ.iu~ ,.aid. unguilty witr,ess,.is one who gives.: sworr. ·st~te'Tlent 1 so tnLt ~e ~~y b~ ~roes ex~11ined .. to test his accw'c.c;y v,2r.:;city·or crcdi:,ilit;y., 11 With dui,.r)ep:ct, I think this was::. 11isd.ir.-:ctio1. o;:.. tl12 r~-rt of the trisil ~1agistrc;.te, tc c:s·su'TlG tnc 2;;:,;o:lL.x.t to be ,.::llinc lLs . . rJ.J tner"fore guilty, because ne elects to .:;iv·" an unsworn stc.i:::nent. 'Ine law, cannot give hi 'Tl ti:ut right und-ar ti".-1
i)rovisions of $'2 ction- 206 of the C.f•. C. and at the sa11;: ti11e, conde11n hi'Tl "' li;:;r: or i;-uil ty; b&caL..ss ll~ hss elected the saiQ right. Dn~er the previsions of 3ection 206, cf the Cri 11inal Procedure Cod~ C"'p 20, t11.:: :.ippell::,rlt is .JlloW•lJ. to el1.: ct to de;fend hi 11scl·f, s~rnrL or unsworn. It h::. s be n 11c.ld, in ;,IS'IOl~ ·-~BJ;fif, Vs R•.(1961 .lU, 274, that t'r1•:re is nc justificc.tio11, in drc.,dng adverse inference, fro'll th'; :..ccusecl ::.1 ction to give i,lrlS'il0rn st;:.t.e"1?nt. This is not to s::y hOW'2V~r, that the •rri..fistr:,te is net' '.:ntitle4, even to . infor'Tl the ~ccustd, or think, til~t toe w2iLht cif sworn ev~jehce, ~ay b heavi,~r, th.:::n the unsworn st<.t':'"1Crrt. B..:..t it -nust all the sa1'le be 0 clear, tt.-~.t while a 11:;.;gistr .. t 1:°. 1 is eLtitld to Lke into .:.ccount on accus d .p<3r,sor.'s rc,fus,-'l, to g,iv,:; evider,c': on o..,th, this does not go 0 to bolster up u we~k c~se, or, to reli vs tne prcs2cution, fro~ proving the case, beyond rs:..son-.:.:bl-2 dcu,)·t;, r,or, should. s1J.cD. !:.L.' cticr,, be considered evidence r,-quiring to b~ cor~sid.•!re.:1 7 tc the prejudice cf the c.ccu.B~J. - I snc.ll cc,nsiG.~r ths effcct cf tn-: .bcve 'llisdirf;ction ldter. . .... /6 6 ~ ~~- '~r. '1otcnb2, 11::.y__ing s~r.wr;. s-~V-c;r:.;1 -.isdirections, the :.,bove bein 6 on: of tnsn, pcint~d out, tn~t tL~
-Prell~ut's ~libi was c.lso rejected, first, bec~ .... s•c of tn~ preJu.dg'.'TI'.H~t, t.t,~t siric~ trn c.pp31L.ut ehcted to. 1lc..ke ::ir, uris,vcrn stc..te11~;{1t, i'l-~ Wc..S u li-~r,. die. bec- . . .s<c: for no coiisi~c:~~..:. re-.;scr.. E-Lvin1:, obsGrv"J.'tn;;"trj,c.l 't. iibtrc.te rc::.,,soning, in t,1,..:: jUue_:'211,:itt on_ tnis. ~sv·,c-t, l fi1;;..,. co11fort in the 8bOV<l sub'Tlissibns. I .fc.tho11,· tne tri::. l -~c...[istr_:.;te' s coi.clusions, c:s iL ctfect S.::iying, th:.:t sine::. tr1e c.,f,I;.;lLnt cii::; not s~ti_sfy hin, tn-c1t he: was on duty durint tne qu.-::stioned. hours, .:.nG :._.t..,s, he nust 11J.V~ been fi.l.iltl. If this b-l t11e c.:,se, ~nct I c.:ll convinc 12a· it is,· ~nen this is <in ·8ct of viol12r.ce, upon th-! l~w r·.::g,rding ::.libi. dthough the '-'PP•3lL:.nt tried tc-prov·2 his :.:.libi by c-olling i:.., l✓ it11ess; -t.fJ,.did ~o, not oec--use the l.,w r:~qui:r-:G hi11 so to. clo. F'or, :...lthoug.t; c.libi is CC'Tl1lO!lly' called a def,nc,:, i-t: i's n:ct t1::.;2 L.w of tnis ccLL:1try, tL.t t1.e accused r;~ising it;~• n:..:s fo. ":Stublist or pro;ve it. 'I'c furt..:1H ,;XphiL this, I cHI seeking a~fsist2.r;ce, in the c::;s,.::. of, - ii. Vs JOHi\SOI~ (1961) Q.B. 970 2t page 970 in which th, leisl status of elibi ~ the olibi we loosely cbll a defenc~, was expl;;;.insd. :It"was held:- ,. . 1··- . . . ",~libi. is co1111on,ly cc:.11.ed. ::;
def·,11ce; it nay be, the true vie1if :of _£:,n• dibi, is the Sc.ans t;s thot of self defenc~ or provocaticn. It is th~ an~wer, which the i:.lCcu.sed persor,, puts f-oward a~19- the burqen of proof, as will ,sppar in -~ mo'Ti_:::nt,- .in thi -~ens~ of estaolishing th~ guilt of the c:iC-cu.si::d, re ~:ts tnr0ugl1out or~ ·the· sld-= of the -p::rosecuiior,. If G 11'...L puts fow2;rd ::.n ~liS\•:er in- ( th-e sh,..;pc_ of . ;;;;r.-, .,libi, h,) GO•:S not irJ. L:w; there--:-:. b;y·:.,ssu:nl, Jp.s:b.;;.rei•rn of pfoving ti1c1t cWSv)er.'.'. . lt h8S si11iLrly; ur.u. wit1:i. e<uL\l fore.;, bec:n rieid. in '.D.h ~svl. .Ji-1.ll;S vs. R. (1970) H. c.1·. )o. 65. ·..;;11, th:..:t tl:lis 11e_2.ns,· i~ t1~at ~1~e stc.giu~ of &n di.bi. by th,_; ~cc:::u.s::: d, db\ s not s.inft tn':: bi..rci...:n of proof . to - hinself tci ptove tne s~id ~libi. It w~s tnereford inpropar, for-thi'. tribl l~Gistr~te, to req~ire th~ first appellGat to prove, ne waa o~ duty_ i.iu.rini:,. the y_u.estioneu pEriod. It wi::s for tn·J tri"'l court~ to - see if tue 71,.,teric:.ls for l!libi .rc:.is·ed '" rc:Lso,Lbl~ doubt on the c·cise in re;,p,:;ct of th<; c:.ppell:...nt'.s: c2se c,S:.. wnole.: .Th•-.: pr-::judic:...il.effect, if ~r:y, ,:wi;I.l be vJsi t•::d. s_u.°Q::;ec;u,..'.11tly.' ,~r. 'fot211ba, was wrnsuc:.lly v~b.--211,2'r.tly bi.dterir:.g·,· c:.r.c. ~~r. -Finda - the Std'-! Counsel bdr,f of' ido11tic:...il
-.-ie.w, th.:.it tiv~ trL:l ·.,-c..gistrate reli~d, on the ~worn evid2~a~ of tne 3id Llnd 4th appellant - all: co-accus~ds, jointly chargid ~nd tri~d, to convict tne ~ppellant, and that as th2 S-2. were 3CCO'Tlplic:;s to convict, corroboration should have b•J-n sougi1t. 'Tr. ··I1:1t211bs and ·~i'. Fiuju, w·~re· -of the view,· that it - wc:is uns;.;fe to uphold convict.ior:, ·that solely stood on such .testinony. :fr~ 'fate Tiba cited c.iL aut.aori ty- F'i.Bl..1-.lW OBEL & O'I'F.ilihS VS. UG.I,Di (1965) E_, 622 to show, how uppr2cLted ws:is the corroboration; wh'2re acco11plices, give ~vid2nce against the ~caused. In de~line witn thes'2 sub11issions, the use of sho~tcut tdctics, -nay oe d.:..ng':lrous, :Bir st to b-c: observed, is. the fact, t:C.:;lt bot~ the 3rd and 4th appellc:nts ;::,ef,;1.G.e-.l th,:,11selves sworn. ., nd, unler tne provisions of Section 13(3) of the Evidence ~ct 1967, an ~caused person chur 6 eC. with an off2r~c.2, is on his own 2pplic.:.tion, a c,011pe tent witr,ess tior tae def<;;r;c,:, Wll'3tL:.r l1e is jointly, 01' ,::lorie c11:...;rg-ed'. Where, he h-.;s so ~l-=cted to giv"' eviJ.d1ce on o:.ith, c:.i1d if in the course of ths sa11s, hf i-nplic~tes 3 co-~ccus;;J 7 sucn evidan~e is on the sane - footing, us inc.t of au.y ot11··r wi tn:iss; ,,w;i 112,y b ta.ke.t=i intQ 0 · consid~ration, against tni co-accus~ct, wn~tncr tn~ p~ison b{ving evictGnce i
11plicite s hi -nsclf or not. ' i ',voU:ld t.nerefor0 st1i:lre, th€ obsarvcition ori this Sb'TI~ ~sp~ct, iri tne sc1ne dirJtti6n abov~, in R. Vs ivdcJria (1945) 12 .fi,.C; . d4 at p&e,:..:,e 86.- · It wns obsi::rveci as follows:- •.•• /7 7 11 It at the trial n gives e_vidence, su.cil e.vide!lc_!! is on tne Sct1le fo~ti_~is· as t::~at ot· any ..2lli! wi tness.1..-.!:nd 110;-( be "t.<.iker; 'into -co:nside_rqti_££ ;~·ai;~t E·irrespe·ctiv-e of whetri.if-r-·'.+~4' i11pli- ~':'tes hi11se·lf o~ no·t 1 B 1 of cou.r§$:_, cai:, cro1::;s- exa11ine, a·nd t1.,:, questi·cn of a660111Jlice evidence again, hos to be borLe •. iL -nir.a in deciding how sate-, _it is to .:::ct upon this ~,vider;ci:J as agair.st · . B-." While tJere {~ no doubt, th~t tile 3rd'adc~~ed and 4th appellant, upon their· giving evidence, that also·i~plicat~~ tha lat and 3rd appellant ·th~eir .. status is ttiat of an ordirlar~y~ 1~':i~t;~e~s, aL.d therefore their evid-e.hce -riay--be •tak--.,11 into considsration_against othar accused i11plicated, i 1 e·., - 1st and 3rd ar;rellar1:t ·11ere, -t:1e ::;u.~stion, I pose here is wnether the' autnor'ity ·cited ·_b;y ·1r. ·-~&te.,,ba. stfictly applies. In the case of Fl\BI.iiNO OBEL'& J,i~O'lfllih V. uc:.Ai:n;J, (1!9_65) El\ 622, the. acco'Tlplice witness wa,s. a -,~.rosecu:tiori: wi tnes·s, w11ili.::· in' t·11i~ cc:1se. the 3jd accused ar.d 4th appella11t werg defence.
witnesses and s·i11ce th-:: strict rul.es of corro- boration of eviden:ce by acco-npliqes, 21°:re applicc1ble, to evid,rnce of acco:nplicss given for trie prosecutio'n, · ·a·s e1 safe guard agair;st ··conviction based on-· $UctJ. prosecutior/. evider.ce without corroborc.1tion, stri6tly speaking tne n8ed for cotroborc:1tion, of an ac6011plice evidence-only c:1ris~s ¼here ac96~Plic~ ~y~deLce, ts given for tne· . : pr_ose cu tion.~ '!he above ca s.;, cto~ s· r;o t, the r 8 f" or 2 str ic Uy apply 1 , to .the sit.Llation we hav,;;, wtiera t.i.1c 1 e\rnrn defenc(:S, though l:lCC01'lplic;:,e:: evidence, .i11plic.:.ite a co..;aecus".)1~ .·, . . . . ., ., ~ : ~- . •·' , . ,- ~. ::,,, ·,.<.If W_E ~c~~pt; that tvJ pr·a'ctice· aross: to soifc gli:8.rd ac~-u.s_ed:~r:,fron · convf6.'ti~n-on:-ttt·bksis of_acconplice viitnesses call<.!d by the P.!-O~ecution, then strict rule'.s _of corroboration cont.enplated by the practice, that hc1rp gain;,d tne r•,spctability of h,w, ar:c not strictly required:wher,e . :the .acci-1....sfd-, thoµgh an ~acconplic~, _inplice1tes his co-accuse~, in hi~ . ·evidenc<=, _ in def<:i1c:·. Banner11an J'·;: es" h-, then was, in .. 'li~ifr,y.I DUp.O . V. REP.()BLJC, HIGri COLJF:T CJ!· iJ:.A1 2~,:.r.A ·cR: llpp. B. l,o. 332 of 1965 (not repo:v:t·ed}, was of tns sane ~ibw,. ~rneri I!-r ~ai~ ·c.r:i.d l ,quot~:- "Ther,:; is no rule ·ot lc.w, i-vhicn r •qu.ir;:s_
'the svidenc•, of tn':'. d•}i'·r~c'.i w1tr;,,ss, to b2 tr1ated with cautior. in tr1-.: abser.c\j of any corroboration. The rule ,as to corrcboratich of ths ~vid~n•~ of an acco-nplice, is,c:.pplicable, in ny opini£in, only _to ~vi'dertc,~' of acco-nplic~s givir:g svidcncc for the · JH:'OS-c_,c-ution, as a Sofu guar_d against conviction ,: on such pros-icution evid~nc~ without cotroborbtion • • • • • • • • • • • • Natuarally, evid~i:,.ce _givsn by a d_efe1ice witness, wno has &n acco'llJ;::li:2 ce would b:, subject_ to scrutiny, be.fora it is i.i_::c€;ted, but it _c;loes. not ur1d,:ir any circu'llstances require corroboratici'n' as~ rule of l~~ or pr~cti¥e, even, waare it tends to support t~e case of tne prosecution to prove tf-.e,gu.ilty of ,rn.acci..,S6d rer·son." From tne above, I a-n forced to 'Tl~ka ine necessary observ~tions. First, as I_ have .h_e],_d elsewhtfre~ :fierain 1 :,y_h>:!_r_~__ .::.n._:,q<;,i+s•~d 1,-.:.cson el~cts to 'give his o.d·:::rrc~ sw·o'~/i','_ :~·hs"··i:-via·~:r~_(?,·c:_$.9. 'ia.d':dJc!S'cf; ';e-n.j,ojs tne s::.l'Tla stc. tus as c.,ny .oth-=:r: ·011-:d:b:i'jry''\·iitrfafis·. Seco~/cffy, W.J:Ll'J sucn-ivid.:r1ce i11plic,des tha co-"'ccus-e-d·s, c.:r~o. ti':..L .::.c·c ... si::d wnos:: evid2nce .is .i111,licuting ihe otnti:r, is otaarwi~e an occo~tlic~, such cte±dLCd uqconplice evidtJnce, does not eith~r cu.t of pr8ctice or ~ny lJw, r~quire corroborution.
Ln~ thirdly the Jbove notwithst~n~in&, wn.re = swcrn ctefenca inplicwids u cb-~ccusdd 1 the Court nust su.bj-.:ct sucn i nplicat~r.g c:viC::;;nc'-', to sev,:re scrutiny, and such ~vidiDCt ~u.st b~ cr(dance reLdering, to otner ind~pcndent evidance, to founci. cor.viction. I .. s.1;;.ll tn-::rcfor,!-1:roc,.:d to scrutinis: t110 evidcoc_e. 1:ppelL,nts No. 1 "-nci 3 were convicted sol~ly, on tl10 0vit..::Lc\J by .... ccu.seds ho. 3 and 4. 'lhi;.t is, '-'f'<.Jrt f'ro11 disclos1.,.re_s, ti•. t tnc 3r:l c:Ld 4ti: ,.ccu.sed did 11ention tk,n to t.i.1<c Folic3, und in·tLoir j0f-:.,nce,_ th:-r~ is no·.otner €').'·id:~nce, to cor.n,ct the: lst,.-,,lf\i 3~d,_;,:::re1Lrits \·:ith t,1'.:, off- ncc. ~:cwe.v~r the tri<-ll 0 '-',,-cistr--.t·.,, _b2lLvins-. t.:1~ .. ]rd ,- . rd LitL ::.c,~· .... s ·Je, proc,!·:ci.eJ to c9Aviction. t ~ • • 1 jb 8 It se9'TIS to 118, th_,t tri'c trL.,l •~;.. gistr:,ts, ,..;·,.s b2inc lc:d by.;; 11isdir2ction in L,w trL.t, clcconplice E'vidcncs I one,! believe a. :.. coLviction is no t I ' illegul, b'~c..1use therc:·-h::,s· not b·-er. · corrobcr, tion. I h,,ve shown herein above, th~t this is ~pplic0bli wn~r~ suco :vi~cnce ~s si~en by the prosecution. Furtho.r·;·:...:tne tr:CJ·'~sgistrJtE;, if I Jl:,y _rut· it courteusly, :I~;} for got, ti.12 t t1e·--w-'":s·:.,€,f}f3-~-n t1ull5':~r-eIJiri{f:~,C?JtJ.~.. ~ Y.1-0.~Eic~i w:.. s gi Ven after the closure_ of the :rr cs2
cution' s"·c.0·s':2_, ...?.~---~rw t the -ju11ping of the provisions of _Section 205 of tile Cri'Tlin0l Proc,1urJ p~}i~- is nowhere to be j ustifia d. Even if, ttiia evict.e:..,ce by ti16 3rd :,rd 4t.i1 .iccc;.s<;J ;,e.re c..cco11plice svidence 1 on th~ prosecuticn 1 s side, the tri~l ~~gistr~te, s2~~s to hi:;Ve lost sight, of rie:c·,:sF:J:.,ry steps b2forc· c..-ctir.g on it:. :'l'he Court's ;first duty, in consiJering occc111lice evict,2r~c•J. is, iir.;t, t_o decide whether the •i.:lcconplice iis 2 creaibl<= .-,1tHess.· This is r,:;cess1-r.y because, if the Ccurt fe'='ls, it cc:nnct b'::licvt: such i;.Cconplice scvidencc, .it rej~cts it, c.nd. ur.L:ss tlv.:re is indep;.;ndent evidd1ce s.uffici:.;n"t _to justify conviction, tho 1rosecution n&y fuil. The seconJ stept is, wr.ere tho::: c.:C(;011plice is credible, the Colll't nust nor11c;lly proceed to loo~ for sone indepeudenci evidecri~, ~hich conn~cts th~ ~caused with the cri'Tle, :.il tnou,t:,t1 tlle conviction is no· 'illq;:.il for l;.,ck of such corrobor~tion. · If, wi·wera to tes\'.trie crEdibility of the 3rd accused first, I would definitely not, concur, with th,J tri::31 '~sgistr--,te' s ·finding that he.is i:Jbsolutely credibh. ]'irst, the 3rd accuseu 1v2is c l . person,._ who .s ccept, d to··do the transpor t,:.:tion of - goods, unde_r cov~r of darkness, cl fact :th-:i t tt.iht~ hi ii;:.· Secondly,· he- und the.' 4th
accus= d, tried to bribe Rebek8 ~hri211b-2, out cf her responsibility.to. report, "' the11to authorities. ]·urth:r,:·•cilthoug.ti,.:th<:l 3rd accused:told the· Court, that the first :1ppollont Wcd3 :.:.t th·c · ho-ne of the. 4th, 3ccused, FW 2 Reb12ks ~.i!ire'Tlbe said h,2 Wes ·not there. She testified thus:- "When I ::nt-~ret Nestory's house,.at the. inst~nce of ec~used-No. 3~ and Np. 4, there were nobody else ~xcept both · .·. of· the·11. JI Further Pvd3·1 did no-t s<!r. ·<the-: 1st app,.:lL,nt c'.l.tt1;.;r, not .. did the 4th ,fcc"used, nention tL:: 1st ap}'.el_Lr.t in .cii;:; :xtrr,.-j.~di-0ii,ei_l ..:!3te1tenent. Not only the above \. defici~noies 11atter, bu~ tn: 4th ~nd 3r~ accused, obviously .:.ipfc-ir to h,_;vu h:.:id .::rri -int2rest to s,:=rve, i_n _t11e giving of evidence, tn-2y did. vve ·should not f_or.,,,, t, oY1c: of the; .c ... ruial princi~les of justice, thut whare it .:.,pp~_rs tn_t d ~itness, wheiher · for tmi fros,!cuticn or· co-uccu.sc:J., n_y h:.iv?. so.11.: self i11terest to serve in ·giv:ihg eviJ.er~c:'::, it -is ·c.-::sir.c.bl:e .tll"'t :cc;nfirn""tory or corrobcrL>tive evidauc<j, thc.-f is crJilLrily SOUf.;1t ir•. c'-'ses of acco11:i:;lic-e 's evi-ctenc'~, b. c,1-:fli2 d, 1,ri:c tr1e r s.u.ct. wi tn;: s_s c,,r. bs:: cl"'ssifhd i:..S c.,r, :::ccc11r,licc or not - Si>-= -K.hi~1,.ii'lh:}.,hh,i,K. ·h1, 'I.ER Vs. 0 R. 44 Cr. Lpp. B. 83. 'I'he ir s woe
.the typ-2 . of. .·.,.v,iJ.e.r,ce. tn"' t could not safely be t~ke~ intc considJrution ug~inst tne Lst ~~pell~nt. I have gone 3.11 -\;, es8 distances., to .shoiv the misdirections the trial Court fell into. Consi<,ierin.s-, thot the evidence ciLDii-;.st the first appelhrnt, came frorr; t:1e 3rd ::::nd 4th c.;cu·c:ed, benrinc in mind, the status of such evid:::pce in re3c~1inc; qonvict1.on and considering how mishandled. was his ali-':,i 1 E,nd '.,ow his defence i,&s ignored I am left to say, there' Nos no suf'=' icion,t ,an6. dependa1JL, evidence age; inst him, tha.t could. found c01:viction of. the. Jct c1pp8llsnt. · H'is appc::l, is _therefore ·allowed 1 .conv.ic_tion, quashed 8.nd,_s,"'.i.1t.ence set asi,.,G unless the appellant is. :otherwise,· L:l,0;1:.: lly h0ld,. ' . I no,,, com-3 to Ei,:;-h CQurt Grimi~1,;l J;pp.J~i No. 15 of 1977 - Iddi Lc1s~: .the 3r<l 3pp,:;lJ.:1nt~ Jc.: in, t.;i 0Vl.l....;moe c,s :,:;hoim in the excerpt from t:n sworn te::;~-i1,,6r,y i~f the 3:r·d ·scci.:s...,d. sQppcrtecl by thc::t .- of t.l:c 4th appej .:C:.wt, v: ;s J.0p0r,,.1ed upon to cur1viOt, ·,(fi.is· E)pp0llan-\i. 0 I11r. Pin1in 1 the leo.:'.'n-.:,d 3t:.t.; fttoJ:ne.:· d.-:::clinJd +,o· sl~>port cofrviction, on the ground, tl:cot th0 ovic~0nc0 by co-.·~ccu~. _i,;_ ,·,.:::s 11ot enoL,,zh or s:1fe to.convict. ·,,hcit I __f~_id o.bov0, .,:b:,ut ~10 t-.;stimor:~.- oftlle 3rJ. F.lccused and t::0
4th 0ppolL;int, cippli,.::,J h,.cJr_:.:; t,·o. TL..; 3rd :;:p)u1.~8nt did deny ·his i1'lvolv0r:-,ont in ·k3 crirne, , b'{a~t l·rom t:-:..o GVi~t~nce ;r the 3rd - ........ ·-~. ~-~· f WK • 01/ ••' •''' • * ;'noJ o2xn' o: rIu: ° I 'XCI OTJTXPT ao uo 9T1Oj PTYPPt I. 09t10t{ (iO OWOO O. 9U114 BJt .Xt1L' EM t ?)U -'JOJQ tOA AUUYj ,.OU PTP I. U'9JC ICtju ZU Ut 4 .&Z?) uo mus I uosx ui oi on '' 6 wxj so UT uicin nnd pu 6 scs'o ujojj sxqs OTIn Jutiouii poqts rioj •wp woxt utct utt eto. j - sou ot Jq puut SOM pu".doIS SM --W• 1' piID i -( 2uTcLcLij jLJ oioi Saijq $umop DuTddo.ap pu xo i s) utpiotm O211 U 'tUtUOoil nfu 2Mt1IItj i '°M pIO- t10J •pOJLOdC uosiod aoqnouo tL iJ •uio .stt . sjiis aqq. UTJ2O Pionsoil pUflOJ puu 'ui'o 9 dri o)OM •woJs Roqsi on poouioi cxor ioqj, •op 0140,- U0 0J0 SG14qO0 0140, t OWI0 ..IOCU 141 )UO.IO1 SJI o. .xo •0St1014S ixoot: q.z Su xdcI 2uitVuo oos izoo nji oo Jw Ut 0,15 no.9 j- •JO0S0j 0,.St1t5 Oil 0t-Ot1 I 'd01S C J03 OtTO JOL0,OUU pt10 • utdoo1s j:o ouc'oq suioo.i or. oouoo. • —o.cri•b I puu plus 'uoIiidd0 Puz et. iq pOutwCxO s.so.xo •p-'dcft oqiu I . 0 :40qar ç;j U914M iOflO UII puz aT 'pJT EO 0IT3 S)0CS 00,U1 Ui5140,. Ulp0 pUS 4 8S5O xaoo. rtot. "io •sics iti'icx odd os 'cL/6/6i o a MOS 7XtUJ0tU a140,. Ut --:- iqtpao 'SUr 0,U0E0dd'O TjnV eTT 'stiot awus alln u - uouo. o t'i; ozt - o çp'd • tos dc-'op to ivic To nbo eio5J ot 'AJO0,J o. - otojo Tpn 00
posn=3 pcJ Oj0,. 'ouu 'uoxs puno,T oq pn.st 4 nT . utop ox: 'ioud qt'i Si poSn00? pJ 0T40, JO JUOUJ10,.SO0,. 0140,. '&ICJOAOS UtStU14t1.X9S t11140,Tj [tJIS WSS oq. no2 cTj nuuq. 'u:. :oddo tjqi eun Rç 'uo O.;S0,TS stt uoclri 'iuo 'urt 00,. UMO14S s0140,010 RncLp° ot cu0, 'oou;ep Stt Ut 'pcppo }I tUt1.it)jTj 00,. auo2 pULJ at1 14OITTM xoj '14St T inc 00,. rFEtJ Stil UOCIP 'S0t40,00 Ua 00,. eooid s useddc T4n 4,7 sun nL, poos sw oij 'poucutoui u1odde pu 9T.i C1. PIfl° qtTt0, '0JU0[TutIO Oil pc.xoJJ0 SItj nut- jToddu puZ et. 'st. u 'ooid 90,ttIIoddC w-t7 °i. q pop'-I .ca140,. [1t0,7 '0Utq. St140, 15 wlt 140,.tM sw. qusoddo pu ei Mot'iro owi. pIo0, 0} !owoT4 S0,.USOddS - TqTV 9140,. 30,. tUS3)4D WOJJ tnuculladdu .pu ot. o tooq on pios 'spoo2 ssoux5p ;o .xe1oo aun xopun poipcIsuq, ui:c'ddo pu eiqq. 'souit. oexqj. 4 M011 [0n pOSflOO2 pI oii; P014 om *utod otq on owoo o .00idw000t3 US O55 S pOSt06C Utq.0Ot(ItU O{0,. U014M.0S 5I0W. U0tC 'pOSTU rJ0S0O PU'°149 - 'pSr0Os—oO Oq. ;o OOUO -ptAT) Ot0, 0,01fl. 'UM0TS OST)2 OAOt P at. J•Q oouopie c jo sr'ssoTo. uM0'S oioc JcpIac.rttl 015t1 I • • • •eotr.. oosd OT4Or 'ood POr ou03 0/.C14 0,OU TOI.t Ott 140,410140,. qo punoj serk 0,.514M UT 'p0AIO1.UT UOoC p014 c IT 00140,. zx. oniJ ofl •rnxq. oq 0,.oU Pub 0 U0000C SpOSn0Ot7 p.T.0Tfl. • 0,.0t0, pilE 0SSO St 00,. p4OIo iVUSAOoJ 0,.Ott SSM 'Md 10 OOUCpIAO OtTO,. 0,014O,. C'Ifl OH U0i40TtU00 pUflOJ
00,. 0,Ua01JJT1SUt SOM 'litT O,StT0.S 'PI°14 00,. 0,.JP.O 51140,. uodtb 03UptA0 0140,. 0,-14 0r 5 11 50 10I ru cT: LL6T/c1 o•t sod IstTTwTJo q.usriedde 140,47 9140,. S53JCTUO140 JJ•0.S0 DUO 'LLi/O:i 'oii 1ooddi •EUtIUi.IO - pu 0T4 1 (1O't3 30,J SOOTT'T 3C'TO3 .q ssodd on OOO MOU • • • •W114 00,. U.itl0,.01 aq o. tC1t14X SO pOJe -rUO; rtT Ttrn::'; J::o"t oLt,L 'Orçi' T•tO 'soouoJjfl J0t0,o OJ 0J14O, '3t14 Sp;14 tr1 '- S0tt1t1 'LO0,•0tpCIflUt p9S5O[EJ OC1 00,. O,.U510dd5' OT4JJ OPT SO 0,.OS oOttoO,.Uo pLU: ' r00UI) u.tO,.OIA030 'pOflOS Si. 1SoddS° StiTa, •uotaottuoO p1In3 oq 'oue puo 0,QUU'9O poon005 140,47 pu pacJ 9140,. ./q_ e0uOpt1O ot. 'r p0?UtOC OA14 T S 'OTOtTPt O(30r U() OOUOJJO 0140,. 140,1M peO,.00UUOO uaoq UFEU UC pLljj 3 OU'U 0140,. SST IU 4 WtT4 TAO UflO ./O,.JaCTId .XOU 'od s 1 0,.uo1çodds 140,4/ 0140, 140,tM wtq 2uTq.OouuoO Ut .153 S[5J OOUOpIAO .110141 cL/6/6 014 UO pLmcJC 0,uC10dd0 014 aIJ.x1? '14050 '014M 'S5t1 uI5S9S) 911'.d U5IJJT1140,. 'T° '9t1ld 30 OOUOpIAO 0140,. JIU0 01514 OM 'pe0,sotput •zcpeo.I OAOLI I uottsod asot!;t '0,u2 -11odd iof' pue pasriooe —6— C' ........ 10 bac2use I snw ycu propurly on t~~t Ll~Y• The 1',2c:son v,hy I· m:;rkucl yc,u, w:.s boc:1use of your r dffir:rj,cs I t o IJ es uo·r y ;?,.·T----r•\Jr.-, I b;:.~v~ ..... .,,,1.:, n._ . . .J. vf1...nY:~,\. uLl. ;'t • .. ".""I - """1 ,: ..., , ... . Tho 2nd (1ppc1Lmt, (~ccs n;_.t ;_;_~ny ~x,inc
--t t:10 house of the 4th app0llant. Ho clue::~ .Lt 1.L:m 0· s•J.J:i.nc cl,i·c'.~os·,. crncl :·:l:Licugh he Llelibor~ tely ::,voids J.ot:::ils, h,-, d.oe:s !F.t -:;.') 2l: f::ir, '.}~ t::-. c·~·::fil'Jll 2).l ;1h2t PW13 S'."licl_. Of courso, thu COLll'SO ho 0L,ct0cl to f'JlL.,,j is un,l0r.s:t3-nclo.blo. However., If we may cr:.rnu t,-' th,_, r.i'"!rr,)w ,··f tho_--\ofcmc...: 1 ~::..J P'.'llJ hc:ving b.:wn ·credited highly, :rnd for nbvL-u::; r8°·::;cns·, 1_02/1{·1 ,t w1d.ur.c·:~~:12J. ,·Itq·, the 2ppoliant should hBV~ boc•~j;10 S(; ::~ctiv·~, • .:nj_ go -f:, t11~ ·~xGG11t- ci:' r;;,:i·!~~vin[S ohirts·, l"I. f._.ro!ll t .. ,~c-~·C"':I 01r C,.:_.,0,0 ...,··1 ..... _.. .. nu.. J.1 .. U.i.,lc; ,.1.: .. ·r:!t,··-:-.r".; t.n c•'j··~:1 ... ,...,_:·:·J_.., :~-. l ,..-,+),,· Ile;;,,! ... n ~ .. u.:..:,,:.;:,;_ ],.i. ·"·., , •.. '- lL a.i,lnG 1..,, t O d .0 rt" i,lith them. It\;, 'ocfii::.lly LU1USIJ.2l f,_:,r "- o·G.s2bo1.~.::;.r.,.:.-,s t:::.:: _2nd ·appellant w:rnts·us•t" beli0 1i'6, c;c:::ng to a pF1co·;:10 'i's li.11.l:n,.. wn,. 2nd.to ~-pcrs·on not known te, him, to.bEih:ive so f:-,db~ly; 1ncJ,.<:',ctiv.::l:r r);n·cvL:ig sh'irts f.rom their c2sas, nnd put them to s~cks, anti taliirig intin~t8ly, as if they had cordially mot before. Further, asEluminc, thu 2nJ ~ppclbnt'.tms unconn~cted, w0uld it not c1ppo.~r tn him ra~,lly awk-.nrd, to ::_;,::-J :-.ml pp,rticipnte in·th\3 · removing
of new sh~rts from thuir c.ov0rs, :rnd puttin1_; th.om 'into sacks; leave alone, being taken aback by thi ~u~ntity, 3nd qu2iity 0f thag6ods! Furthor on thG cvid.ance of. P~H3, we have her "The 1st :;ccUsti'd disG,)1,YJDreJ., ':S scc·n ::-is tho - ~fr~rd i;xocutive :3ocret-:-,ry, app8ared ond stopped the T~xi t0 b~ chackod. Even the other per~on I did nr.t iiahtify 1 ran away toeothor ~ith the 1st j ccuscd." This pi,200 (,f eviJ...)~lcc:,· w1s net r,d8r:c,.;;u Jcr., 1yj tl!G 2nd appellant, in his d::f.:once. · But ·,11 thu s2.1..o, it ~-s n-:;t us:.t:,l fc.i' ~;n int.;;nding innoc,:mt custt'ru0r, to ru.'1. a:;~,./ 2t tli.:., si._)1t .f L.,; on0.,..;rcei .. unt ,;fficers. i-lnd running 2-;,.,2.y, he is even quust:;.cn::J. ncr susp--..:ct'-'c.. smc,cks n gtiil ty mind. From the abovo uvilancc, tho ovi~Jnca uf the 3r~ accus~d 'cor~obo~ated by that of P'Jl3, .r nm G:iticfiu.l th:::.t tho 2nd 2pp0lL:rnt w:-.G ',no of those, who bruught the rnilwny gcoi:ls, at tho 4th :::c)polLnt' s pbce. Tho 'trio.1 magistrat~, had nc alt.Jru~tive,_ jut to ccnvict ~iw cs ch □ rg0d, ~nd the sent3nce e,f s0v0n yu_2rs, f1:,r ·fr,:.r!•. boin;_~ ;;d,Jqucito, I i:-isond not, to disturb the ssimo. Now, I come; to the 4th :1pp>3lbnt }J:;stc,ry Buhon:0knt vbO is even nt.. .. ,' pl0~ding guilty t~ thQ 6ffanco of ruc~iving c/s 311(1) -0f t~c Penal Code. :Sven if tho·h,o::,_vcms w.:ir~ to tumble J.c,1m, .cJrid
.ProviJ.0:-ice,- to cl1c1ngc every- thing, th3t reminds him of his powors, tho f~ct that_ tho 4th appellint was found in poss);•sicn of ,],3 bicycio··tubes cl' Di::mcnd·, 106, bicycle tubes of Dh□ n □ nt, 42 siirt~ of K0nt, 3 sacks ,of-kh2ki rolls, 6 sacks of blue khaki rolls, by PW13, 25 bicycle tubes, ·J. 2775 brol)d Kont shirts, Kent shirt crvors ('p":rtly burnt), by p:;./20 co ..,lcl 111 t chc:nge. Thnt some of them, were hidclori at tho coL;_inc is too.obvjous to dcubt. Tho 4tff·B~t_,}J0l-1-;rn.t.. ..s:;;:v2s our J..2bour, ,.:n t.his r.sp,;;ct 1 in t:1at hu does not Lleny. · JI011~v0r I with ~-~ri-:iiist·;nc~- ,,,3,.tnos~_od. in tl10 t.;;stimony of the 3rd nccusecl ~ trw _prup,irty .in qu.JBtion w:rn br~Ju:i;ft' .th0re b~r tl1e 2nd appelbn·t, wi.tn b.is friGncls incluJ.inc; Gth 2qcus;,;cl Byash.s.lib in tho Tnxi of the 3rJ. .ciccus:id.. ·. Th8 4t::· :1p:)·011nnt' s cqntontion, is tl-:::1t h0 cl.id not d~b,t, th::.t tho ;'lroporty in quostion, iv,1s l;.;ge.lly :,cquir0d property. Wh2t is strik:incly siznific,:nt, in t:10 tGstimony uf bc,th 3rd accused and~ 4th ::1pp011.ant, is ti"'-' C'.:1sist:cnco ti1J.t t::0s0 goods w,Jro broUG;1t and dolivorod to him, ponJin= their trnnspottation to.some placa, so far unmtintion.:icl. I fin:l JviJ_;;nc0 1 r,.mJGring cr0donco to this, from PW13 w,.h_en in ro-ex:1min2ti•Jn sl:.,J s3ys I and I quote hcr :- n.l":ccusoU }J0. 4 t-v:is
a.1rvnk0r1.Jd ap_ bcfor8 1~00,1s sta.rt0cl to f1.lL It was still z:it :::;.it;ht. I ho2rd those p-6oplu c:::llinr, "H2;::;tori Nostori;', he qnsw.Jr;..:ld, who is he? '.i1!10n I did not ho,-,r ,nythin:':, 0ls0. 11 •••••• /11 11 V..;ry ·..:arl;:r in thJ liiOrnin,:;, 2 h..:;:~r~ SOli,.) p0c·plo ;,),:kine yc:u Uil• a Giving r..;sy.:..;ct tc t:10 t stirr.c-n:: ,._,, Vill3, ::!,.; JjcJ. th.J tri::-1 Court, and constcJerinc t.i:c..: ht:l)rc t1 f doJ.i.v ...·r:~ -:.f ,:'~\:'i.1ds, ::.:: t...:f;t.'i.fiod b;V 3rd accusod., it is r..ct pc!::sibL: to c,,nc- tc e fin;.;.:n~, t: ~t th8 4th .::i_pp0l1.,nt, w::7 lie: Vd 'b::: ;n ·.:it:1 t:ir-s-:;: 'i'.i:Cin~· hir.: u~:, r.c.:::.· ~ossibly conclude 1.1ith ~"'!.UY c~1'-ti•i11t;t, -t~.:.~ . t :.:--; ~11:::r :1·v.: 11::-'..;n cu.t f.--r tl·1-3 _.ur:.;·1c3e of thoft, b.cfor ~ h-..: ,,1c:s e;1::i!c:n•.;:.l.. l ·.;culd t)·!c:r;_;:f(,r:; i·icld> t11.,t t:1c ~viJ.ence, f i:l l ls f"'r sl·i :.rt, of ., st·, '.J} fr,!:. :ng, 8 ~ tl. Jr c i:.:'c u.mst-::.n t ic.l l ly, or directly, t:v.:t t:n .:';.th a::~),._ill.·r:t 1 i·1it:l o·:;rlcrt:: ctol..:i, t~:_, ~;~:id z.oc,cls, :,hiL.i the sn~d ~&rj irt tr2n3it • . Hc,;.Jv..;r, -I h::v.:.i 't.0 int•_)rvc113 ··::,t 't.:1s st·«GJ, tc: :t'c,rost::11 the 4th nppclL,nt; from soL.:::inc .hims.3lf ,· itith thu 01b:; 0;,., ccnclut:ion. ils he hims01f Gought, ::lthoilc_:;h even without iris- indulgenc0, n question of
'tuilty receiving, ~ould hive ~ttr~ctcd ~ttention, I shcil now consider, 1.-1i10th0r th<.l 4th .:i:)p0lbnt cc.n still b1.;, on thu wronc sicle of t_he le;,;, c::.s n -cuilty r.)coiv3r - c/s 311(1) of tl10 Penal Co...:.e. Taat ha r~coivad ti~ goods ~lrca~y sho~~1 ~bove, 0xcitcs no c6ntcntion. It is as clesr ::is J.-.y. li'irst, .h0 '.-Jas founJ. in possGssion of gooJ.s in qu!;ntity .:mJ. qu:;lity, that cannot tame surprice, in tho community tho 4th nppclbnt comes fri:-m. Further,- some of them were foL:nd hidden in the ccilinc, a f::ct. that :-locs vioL:mce, to l1is evidence that he innocently received the same. It ii net n9rm~l to hide, wh~t one has lcgitimat9ly acquired. Further I the -1th appellant with the 3rd nccusecl c:::llcd PWl.2 inside t:18 house, and triod. to offer ho'r.'a oribe of nbcut 5000/=, which is nr.,t smnll rncney, b0_c2-use she po'sod. qs a thre:::t, when ex<Jrcising her curiosity, to sao wht':~ wr.:s hn·p~,:.:ninc. With tho· ;::br.·Je buini:;,th?· :mdoni::ble c:rne, it bahr.vos ma t•J find out how, the uvilenc;:; ·2bf'Vj 2cc;·;r.iri10I~te the .;l~r.1i.rnts of receivinc stc-len prcperty c/s 311(1) cf tha P011nl '.;o.:::o C:-,.p 16 ,.f tl:e kwsi. I ne0d not travel ~:rent <list--.nc,.:::: :.c1 ·ti::i:, ·out r'.-;f..31' t,- t~1:, c;:se of IDI s/o WiZIRI v. R. (1961) E1\ 146 1 :t'cr the authorit :ive p:.:-r·;i•,;:::iti)nt t.h.,t the 0ffende Of r
nc"'1·v1·'1'" """' "'-' .. t.J str., J.. 7 •.,n p·,-;·,1·,.,+., V - 1 •.1.1. >J 1--.-,,~ t•,.,.. ...., ,...,~c-,..,n+1··...,~ v;. f . ··• ~.:. ....., ..., l v -... ,.::, ._. _,... .,lr->m-"n ...I., s·f n"mely (a) ~ 1,,;; ._. ..., 1..., i there must (!?Ve be-:m t:1.-::ft ,:f p~•f•y:-0:ty (o) pos::;e;s;_;frn uf sLi.ch. stc len pr0pcrty, by the ::-cc:us8d 1 ·rnd (c) -t~1-·t 'ih,:m ~no :::ocu::i.:.id r1.;ceivecl the property he :~new c--r :1;;d r;;;::s·.n t,:· ·:_:,~_j_:n"', t:.:·t j_~ :v::u. 0:.i.:m felcnicusly st,:lcn ,_,r obtc.ined. ::e G!itortc:in ~ - <l,: u'Jts ::,".; :-ill, t'.1, ~ th"' prr:p8rty found on the 4th r.:p.~ell::nt ,;,,\:; .:Jt, 1.:m, '1r!d, W,.; i:.-.ve n,: c.a.c·ubt :::t c::11 that the 4th ~ppoll2nt ;-us in _)css..;:;sicn ·.,i' 'tL3 :.:··.;1:.c. · The 4th appellc::nt' s unpursu-_)d tint, 'r!Q;,; 1 th~.t :1,.: diu. :1:'t '.me,,-, t.l1-..: s·:1;,._ 't.; bJ 2t0l1.m. ':rhe law docs ri-.:,t c)njc;,r, convictin;: ~_.-JopL.J en nc uv:;.. ..:.,nc-.::, ri:,r is it the spirit of t,ws.::: th?t :-:dminist0r it. It tllurJf•).cu "oJh·Jvus ii,..: tc cic.:;k, what the position is. T:1..:ra -iru f;..;w· in.;t::nc...is, w:,dn :,J<J h:::v0 :-,n :::ccusod person tdllinc; tl1e tr~_c1l Court, "0.K. I knew the prq,.:.:.rt:, ~,~s stolen."· The law does nst even c2st.,. the burd.en c.f ;)ru.:..f en :1im. lt is the prose_cution to do th:it, ::i1d guilty kno,vled~::;e, whil0 1 it
i,i<'.!J' n~t· be easily :;_)i'ov0d: by or through iir;:;ct uvid,mcc,' may be inferr.::id. fr,;;;, circumst2nccs, th::it .irrcsist~bl';y po.int in th;1t .d.ircctiun. Thus, invari:J.bly ~, rul.as of circU171st1nci2.l Gvi-1.encc must npply, and sctch circwnstnncos must irresistebly leau to 'the conclusion, th.::.t the poss.::ss•:-r cf st::l...m property, know, ,or had rea. son ta kn'm,1, the s.::mc t6 bJ str: 1·0n t ,-;hen he r occ i vod tho ·smne. It has been, so hdd. ·in IDl s/o :·rnZIRI (supr.::) e:nd KJANGI NJO:JOGE y. R. (1963) EA 624, a·nd I 111::.vc r:io recrots in f,<Llo'::ing the s::me. I h2.v0 shown above, tho 4th ::1ppellc:mt'•s circurnstr:nces cf ;_::Jsscssion of the same, ranging from recoivinc th0 s2mc .c:.t ni;-;:1t, to loaC:.in;-; t::em into sncks, and burning shirt covers, ti::, hiding sr.me in the coilinc, ~nd 2tt0mpto at brib~ry. .All this; ~annot be dcno by ~n~innccent minJ, and LlJ conclusion thit he know, the pame to lEiv0 ooen st::::lJn ;:it t:-i:o tit .. G 1 they were brr.uc;.t is in,~vit~ble •. Unu..a'r the provisir:-n's 0f Soctfon 187(1) of trrn Cr illlinnl Pro_c-Jdure Code Cnp 20, I find the 4th .:::p~x:iJ.:lnnt nd ::-:uilty ;:is c:1G~·c..:d, but guilty, under Section 311(1) of t:!e P;;;nel Codu Cc:p 16 .o:.':' r·..:c::Jiving str,lon pr.opetty•. - t ::. ,1,2· J •·.;. • r, •• ,.":Jn~.::v rt~;:: 6, ....) L.\ ~cl:.::.L:~,__.":; - ...; ...L:.~/ ... · .. ~:1
~Up,;~~ 'Jct 19'72t .-". . . . ~ e· i• ... -."."'",·~.-,. 1 r·,·.:.c·-"lv:'.:1---. v.J :,..,,, . • ·~r' a.;,..,~_j, J. l .1,.·...... • ",. ,.-,'.:""t··'!' .:f .L........ -:,. ,' 'tli.::: sp~c:.;·-~-:'~tH~ ~1;r.-~:-: -~. -:'. -1,_,_,. - ~-~· ; ~:._:..~~:•.:.,r.~, ~~-- ·: .~.H- (..,:._ -~ .: ~:;, ~: .,_ ·.:: ~.J, .... J'\1."'~.;, c:r.tl .f; ;r.:".:l's_:.~ll•~--i- ,·t::...; ·,.· ._,.:l'';_;:'" ;::~c•.::.:~,li..J 5,.._,2.j/r::: .:.::. , ~;.....;. ..·,:.·:,;~ ;·\it .bbi·v::luo O +' ;t(lG. L; · :...L > ~ <f. ;_· :...u·J.f: l~'l ~ ~ t: ~- ;;~-~-: ;J _,.'.'fl f~, ·t~ . . '.J --: ...~ ;_"~:"-~. ;·~rlt ..i ,l ·.: .-·t ": i ··v'.;rJ.. '·r ~~ _:arr. G2tisf:. ..:i.l' 4:.::~·t .t:. i:C.:1~-t L .i.:.'-~s, 26 'jlt:;.-..; t:i:::l{i· :.."·'... :~_li:J, 1:·:.--~- ~_,~·i•~:;:jrcJ,,:·--tuq.:::s, l:r\ ~t. ..v.:. ..:..ti.:. ., ... '..L' ~ · tb.;::n · j, OC 0; /~. I ·. ,,i ,: t tl:.~ ..., ._f .· .:.•o i11::: li.:.L~ , to upnc t tl1c s0.:·:~ ..;l!C .. .: ....~f t; . .;v0;i .y~· ~'3, t-:--~·G -~:_,.,. tl... i:··J. C.::..:~'..:~_.....d::ir~,.:. ·~'-<~~. T.1-!.-~ ;;.ppu~l .l•,,· 1· ..
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.