republic vs yoram hamis others 2005 tzhc 266 29 july 2005
- Citation
- republic vs yoram hamis others 2005 tzhc 266 29 july 2005
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 29 July 2005
- Posture
- Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing After Guilty Plea
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 29 July 2005
- Posture
- Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing After Guilty Plea
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The accused, being youthful first offenders who pleaded guilty and have already served significant time in custody, are convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to three years imprisonment each, as a longer custodial sentence would serve no useful purpose.
Court disposition
Convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Each accused sentenced to three years imprisonment.
- Right of appeal fully explained.
02
Material facts
Parties
Republic
Prosecution Counsel: Mr. Lukosi, State AttorneyYenamo s/o Hanisi o Machar
Accused Counsel: Kom KayasaBenedict s/o Binanuel
Accused Counsel: Kom KayasaAmounts and remedies
- Time in Remand Custody: 2.58
- Sentence Imposed (years): 3
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing After Guilty Plea
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the accused are guilty of manslaughter contrary to section 195 of the Penal Code
- 02
Appropriate sentence for youthful first offenders who pleaded guilty
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The accused pleaded guilty, are first offenders, showed remorse, have served two years and seven months in custody, were youths at the time of the offence, and the incident arose from a minor dispute with the deceased who was their friend. Leniency is sought.
- Respondent
- No objection to the facts or the post-mortem report. No previous records for the accused.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Sentencing principles under criminal law and judicial discretion
A custodial sentence should serve a useful purpose and take into account the age, remorse, and time already served by the accused.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The accused, being youthful first offenders who pleaded guilty and have already served significant time in custody, are convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to three years imprisonment each, as a longer custodial sentence would serve no useful purpose.
Obiter and limits
- The incident was unfortunate and arose from a flimsy reason.
- The deceased was a friend of the accused.
Court disposition
Convicted and sentenced
- Each accused sentenced to three years imprisonment.
- Right of appeal fully explained.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 29 July 2005
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 29 July 2005
iir ‘l'Kiv high anna- c f- JP. (l-abcra R egistry) Gam iM j sessio ns c.^s hc. 7 of 2005 l ’HS I^PUELIC
TARSUS 1* YCR&t s / c H llIS @ Q.7JACE3R 2» BEMEDIOaCH a/o i, P R C C 13 iC D I IT G S nigh Court S essions at fi ’abca:a Date 1 29/i/20Q3 Cor: an « £*3*3* Mzirayj judge lir* Lukosi 1 State ifcuxtrney fear the R epublic Accused (nane) Yen: am o /o Hanisi © l^ach^r ) Benedict or b/ o jBinanUQl ) ajpo p resen t uxxXog custody arA represented by Kcm Xayasa* In terp re te r I* E efidh English in t o K isw abili aafi v ice v e rsa I'jotico o f triaL cn Inform ation fa r Manslaughter .contrary t o s e c t io n 195 c f the PenaL Cede was duly served cn the accused* b e fo re the Court pa 29/7/2005 Inform ation i s read over arid explained 1,0 the accuseds in they are thPir own lan^iis^e . ’ required to plead %berate* P le a : 1st accused - I t is true 2nd accused — I t is true- Sntorod as a p le a c f n UUH/LT* t c the <xhsrge by the t tic accused persons* E .3 .S K3IRJDT
JUDGE 29A /2005 I-'Iy Lcrd, the docoasad Laurent Simon died On f 4 / l 2/2002 at KasuLu ^ is t r ic t hospital within Kasiilu D istrict^ in KL^caa Sosion# A day before his death i*e* on l3 /l2 /2 0 0 2 f at Murubcjtia Village| th3 deceased and his frien d one JTassa «3cspo%.ar pn Qliu aidof wore involved in a fig h t with the two accusod persons, on the O'-}:,or side* 'l’ho cause o f th is fi^ h t was over a pioco o f ncpp which the f i r s t accused he# borrowed fie on the doceasod and fa ilo d to return it * Cn hie side, the f i r s t accusod r£Lso had a counterclgin ?£cdnst HihP decoasod, that ho le n t a bod shout t c hi*r., which the deep asod r o f used t o r o t urn it* Hence th is fig h t broke* During tb3 fig h t the do ceased was sovoroly assaulted* He w33 conveyod to hospi'caL whore he diad on 14/ 12/2002* The body o f 'i.he do teased was medical ly examined and according t c the autbysy report cause o f death was due to p e r it o n itis and septicaemia* I tender tho pcs1<ncrtom report as exhibit* £&* • • My Lord, we have no ob jeci.irn* xl0ij®Ci# jt& jL 29 A /2005 Cour t t Poet marten rep ort admitted as exh ibit marked »&»* *t«15*3* i'lfcjJZit^L JIDG5 29/7/2005 FACE'S OCmXiTTSS f l’hc two accusods were arrested* I'he in v estig a tion was conducted and la ter the two were charged with mnnal -tugirfeai’ contrary to section 195 ° f Penal Ocde*
JUDG Vi.fi 29/ 1/2005 ja t Zpcused^ My Lard, the fa c ts arc correct* Pi^U*o* I-L3XiC.iu gaft accused| 24y ^ordj thsi f ac*:,s .-arc correct* &.i3*s* iizzztz JUDGjp 29A /2005 CLur t f in dings 5 l'h» two accused 3 see ccnvictcd as charged* a*s*s* iis m z i JT JDG£! 29/7/2005 &itQ codpn^' s { SrJt. pjyfesi 5 My Lord, ■wo havo no previous records* **j*5* J 15G5 29/7/2005 I&» Kgyafia, 1 IIy Lco?d, -we P^oy faP len iency on the follow ing reasons# i'hc iwo accuscds acco f i r s t offenders* i ’hoy ploaflcd g u ilty s 3110 thing showing romocse ani i<l:.ey havo sorvucl the precious time o f the Court* i hey have boon in custody fo r two years anft seven months * The f i r s t accused was 17 years and the nor:„;„ accused -J6 years at the time o f the offence* ihPy -wore takon in a, rornarfi p rison fete adults* l ’fcP deceased wp.s their friends* 1'ho incident i s unfortunate because the coureu of the fig h t was on a flim sy reason* fIalcins in to account the youth as° ° f ih accusods and the period they have stayed in prison I bolieve tlo y have len t a lesson,* I pray fo r leniency* 3„E*S„ liZJRIX JUDG5 29/7/2005 ^ ft y. y . 5 q g 'i-bP i-wc a-cuecda aco youths who havo ju st attained tb.c a~P o f majority# 'x'hoy hs&o boon in romand custody £cz a p cried o f «\?o years and aovcn mon'hs* 1 b o licv o that a 1 oirs c u s tc d id punish'AOnt. -will not servo nny unof UL purposecr Urflor the circmns^-cnCGs I inposo a throo years p rison sontcnco to qnch. accused* M r ^ y 'yr> •. 'i i .3 .3 . l&l&Kf*.
JUDGE 29 /1 /2.Q05 3 i^ht o f sppaaL f u lly explained*- f yVyV* »i 0 \ E.S. IGL: JULJGiS ^ 29/ 1/2003
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.