NA TZHC Dar es Salaam 13
The court held that citing the wrong provision of law in the application is not fatal and can be corrected by amendment. In the absence of a specific provision, it was proper to cite section 95 of the Civil Procedure Code in the Chamber Summons.
- Citation
- NA TZHC Dar es Salaam 13
- Parties
- Applicant Advocate: Mr. Chandoo; Respondent Advocate: Mr. Kisusi
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Chamber Application / Application for Restoration After Dismissal for Non Appearance
- Outcome
- application for restoration allowed
- Legal Topics
- Restoration of Dismissed Application, Non Appearance, Citation of Legal Provisions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. Chandoo
Applicant Advocate
Mr. Kisusi
Respondent Advocate
Procedural Posture
Chamber Application / Application for Restoration After Dismissal for Non Appearance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for restoration should be allowed after dismissal for non-appearance
- 2 Whether citing the wrong provision of law is fatal to the application
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that citing the wrong provision of law in the application is not fatal and can be corrected by amendment. In the absence of a specific provision, it was proper to cite section 95 of the Civil Procedure Code in the Chamber Summons.
Court Disposition
application for restoration allowed
Orders
- application restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment