N

N

The appellant was convicted because he claimed and received allowances from two different offices for the same period, resulting in an excess payment, which constituted theft under section 265 of the Penal Code.

Citation
N
Parties
Appellant: Reuben P. Ero; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 1979
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
conviction upheld
Legal Topics
Stealing, Obtaining Money by False Pretences
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Reuben P. Ero

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant unlawfully obtained money by false pretences
  2. 2 Whether the appellant committed theft under section 265 of the Penal Code

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was convicted because he claimed and received allowances from two different offices for the same period, resulting in an excess payment, which constituted theft under section 265 of the Penal Code.

Court Disposition

conviction upheld

Orders

  • appellant sentenced to 3 years imprisonment