peter peter junior vs the attorney general another 2010 tzhc 163 12 may 2010

The plaintiff cannot request to add witnesses in a case whose Speed Track Two period has expired without first seeking an extension of the expired period.

Citation: peter peter junior vs the attorney general another 2010 tzhc 163 12 may 2010
Parties: Plaintiff: Rev. Peter Peter Junior; 1st Defendant: The Attorney General; 2nd Defendant: The District Commissioner of Bagamoyo
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 12 May 2010
Procedural Posture: Civil Case / Interlocutory Ruling on Application to Add Witnesses
Outcome: Plaintiff's request to add witnesses rejected.
Legal Topics: Scheduling Orders, Addition of Witnesses, Speed Track System, Extension of Time
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Scheduling Orders Addition of Witnesses Speed Track System Extension of Time

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Rev. Peter Peter Junior

Plaintiff

The Attorney General

1st Defendant

The District Commissioner of Bagamoyo

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Interlocutory Ruling on Application to Add Witnesses

Legal Issues

1 Whether the plaintiff can add witnesses after expiry of the Speed Track Two period without first seeking an extension.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff cannot request to add witnesses in a case whose Speed Track Two period has expired without first seeking an extension of the expired period.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's request to add witnesses rejected.

Orders

Plaintiff given twenty-one days from the date of the ruling to seek extension of the expired Speed Track Two period before making any further request to add witnesses.