revocatus namil versus thomas ndomale 2024 tzhc 597 9 february 2024

The application for extension of time to file leave to appeal is rendered unnecessary and must be struck out due to statutory amendments eliminating the requirement for leave.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: revocatus namil versus thomas ndomale 2024 tzhc 597 9 february 2024
Parties: Applicant: Revocatus Namil; Respondent: Thomas Ndomale
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 9 February 2024
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Land Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Leave to Appeal
Outcome: application struck out
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Appellate Jurisdiction, Statutory Amendments
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Appellate Jurisdiction Statutory Amendments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Revocatus Namil

Applicant

Thomas Ndomale

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application for extension of time to file leave to appeal is maintainable after statutory amendments removing the requirement for leave

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time to file leave to appeal is rendered unnecessary and must be struck out due to statutory amendments eliminating the requirement for leave.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

application struck out
no order as to costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.