richard mahay vs andrea mahay 2023 tzhc 6 19 january 2023
Appellant failed to submit sufficient and genuine reasons for delay, did not account for each day of delay, and documentary evidence was unreliable; therefore, extension of time for restoration of appeal cannot be granted.
- Citation
- richard mahay vs andrea mahay 2023 tzhc 6 19 january 2023
- Parties
- Appellant: Richard Mahay; Respondent: Andrea Mahay
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Restoration of Appeal, Sufficient Cause, Accounting for Delay
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Richard Mahay
Appellant
Andrea Mahay
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant adduced sufficient reasons to warrant extension of time for restoration of appeal
- 2 What remedies are available
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant failed to submit sufficient and genuine reasons for delay, did not account for each day of delay, and documentary evidence was unreliable; therefore, extension of time for restoration of appeal cannot be granted.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment