richard philemoni urio vs grace philemoni urio 2022 tzhc 15861 4 november 2022

The District Tribunal erred by failing to consider the alleged illegality regarding pecuniary jurisdiction, which was apparent on the face of the record and constituted a sufficient ground for extension of time. The omission was fatal and warranted the grant of extension.

Citation: richard philemoni urio vs grace philemoni urio 2022 tzhc 15861 4 november 2022
Parties: Appellant: Richard Philemoni Urio; Respondent: Grace Philemoni Urio
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 4 November 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Non Joinder of Parties
Source Language: English

Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Illegality as Ground for Extension Pecuniary Jurisdiction Non Joinder of Parties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Richard Philemoni Urio

Appellant

Grace Philemoni Urio

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether the District Land and Housing Tribunal erred in dismissing the application for extension of time without considering the alleged illegality
2 Whether the alleged illegality regarding pecuniary jurisdiction was apparent on the face of the record

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

Extension of time granted for the appellant to lodge appeal before the tribunal within 15 days from the date of judgment
Each party to bear their own costs