watumbulwa v democratic republic of congo communication 255 of 2004 2012 achpr 113 22 october 2012

watumbulwa v democratic republic of congo communication 255 of 2004 2012 achpr 113 22 october 2012

The Complainant failed to submit observations on the merits or request an extension despite repeated reminders, demonstrating lack of interest and diligence, warranting the striking out of the communication.

Citation
watumbulwa v democratic republic of congo communication 255 of 2004 2012 achpr 113 22 october 2012
Parties
Complainant: Mr Kizila Watumbulwa; Respondent State: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
22 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Communication Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Struck Out for Lack of Diligent Prosecution
Outcome
Struck out for lack of diligent prosecution
Legal Topics
Right to Equality, Right to Fair Trial, Admissibility of Communications, Procedural Diligence
Source Language
English
Human Rights Law Right to Equality Right to Fair Trial Admissibility of Communications Procedural Diligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Kizila Watumbulwa

Complainant

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Respondent State

Procedural Posture

Communication Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Struck Out for Lack of Diligent Prosecution

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Complainant diligently prosecuted the communication after admissibility
  2. 2 Whether the failure to submit observations on the merits justifies striking out the communication

Ratio Decidendi

The Complainant failed to submit observations on the merits or request an extension despite repeated reminders, demonstrating lack of interest and diligence, warranting the striking out of the communication.

Court Disposition

Struck out for lack of diligent prosecution

Orders

  • The communication is struck out for lack of diligent prosecution.