robert malisa vs crdb bank plc 2022 tzhcld 1017 30 march 2022

The applicant failed to adduce sufficient reasons for the delay because the medical evidence was not annexed to the affidavit but only to the submissions, which do not constitute evidence.

Citation: robert malisa vs crdb bank plc 2022 tzhcld 1017 30 march 2022
Parties: Applicant: Robert Malisa; Respondent: CRDB Bank PLC
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 30 March 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Evidence in Affidavits
Source Language: English

Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Evidence in Affidavits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Robert Malisa

Applicant

CRDB Bank PLC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant adduced sufficient reason for the delay in filing notice of appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to adduce sufficient reasons for the delay because the medical evidence was not annexed to the affidavit but only to the submissions, which do not constitute evidence.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

Application for extension of time is dismissed