robert scheltens vs balden norataran varma others 2018 tzca 477 3 may 2018

robert scheltens vs balden norataran varma others 2018 tzca 477 3 may 2018

The applicant demonstrated sufficient reason for delay by actively pursuing prior applications that were struck out on technical grounds, and such technical delays are excusable under the law; therefore, extension of time is granted.

Citation
robert scheltens vs balden norataran varma others 2018 tzca 477 3 may 2018
Parties
Applicant: Robert Scheltens; 1st Respondent: Mr. Balden Norataran Varma; 2nd Respondent: Mr. Vikas Varma; 3rd Respondent: National Furnishers Limited
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
3 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Application for Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Procedural Requirements, Good Cause for Delay
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Scheltens

Applicant

Mr. Balden Norataran Varma

1st Respondent

Mr. Vikas Varma

2nd Respondent

National Furnishers Limited

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Application for Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient reason for extension of time to file an application for stay of execution

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated sufficient reason for delay by actively pursuing prior applications that were struck out on technical grounds, and such technical delays are excusable under the law; therefore, extension of time is granted.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Extension of time to file application for stay of execution granted; application to be filed within 30 days from the date of the ruling
  • No order as to costs