romani mosha vs tanzania national roads agency another 2014 tzhclandd 48 11 september 2014

romani mosha vs tanzania national roads agency another 2014 tzhclandd 48 11 september 2014

The plaintiff failed to prove ownership of two of the three farms and did not provide sufficient evidence that the remaining farm or its crops and beacons were destroyed by the defendants. The claims were too general and unsupported by expert or corroborative evidence.

Citation
romani mosha vs tanzania national roads agency another 2014 tzhclandd 48 11 september 2014
Parties
Plaintiff: Romani Mosha; 1st Defendant: Tanzania National Roads Agency; 2nd Defendant: The Attorney General
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 September 2014
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's case dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Compensation for Destruction of Property, Proof of Ownership, General Damages, Evidentiary Requirements
Source Language
English
Land Law Tort Law Compensation for Destruction of Property Proof of Ownership General Damages Evidentiary Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Romani Mosha

Plaintiff

Tanzania National Roads Agency

1st Defendant

The Attorney General

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Case / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant destroyed part of the plaintiff's farms
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is the lawful owner of the tree farms
  3. 3 What reliefs are the parties entitled to

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to prove ownership of two of the three farms and did not provide sufficient evidence that the remaining farm or its crops and beacons were destroyed by the defendants. The claims were too general and unsupported by expert or corroborative evidence.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's case dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Plaintiff's suit is dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence.
  • Plaintiff to pay costs.