royal court hotel limited vs executive director kinondoni municipal council other 2012 tzhclandd 28 11 july 2012

royal court hotel limited vs executive director kinondoni municipal council other 2012 tzhclandd 28 11 july 2012

The court held that, given the urgency and the risk of irreparable harm due to ongoing demolition, and the statutory requirement for lengthy notice periods before suing government entities, it is proper to grant an interim injunction under the cited provisions and the court's inherent powers, pending determination of the main application.

Citation
royal court hotel limited vs executive director kinondoni municipal council other 2012 tzhclandd 28 11 july 2012
Parties
Applicant: Royal Court Hotel Limited; 1st Respondent: Executive Director, Kinondoni Municipal Council; 2nd Respondent: National Environment Management Council; 3rd Respondent: Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Natural Resources & Tourism; 4th Respondent: Attorney General; 5th Respondent: Majembe Auction Mart Ltd
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Interim Injunction
Outcome
Interim injunction granted
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Demolition of Property, Government Notice Requirements, Inherent Powers of Court
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Royal Court Hotel Limited

Applicant

Executive Director, Kinondoni Municipal Council

1st Respondent

National Environment Management Council

2nd Respondent

Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Natural Resources & Tourism

3rd Respondent

Attorney General

4th Respondent

Majembe Auction Mart Ltd

5th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Interim Injunction

  1. 1 Whether interim injunctive relief can be granted pending notice periods required before suing government entities
  2. 2 Whether the application is competent without a plaint
  3. 3 Whether the cited legal provisions support the grant of interim orders

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, given the urgency and the risk of irreparable harm due to ongoing demolition, and the statutory requirement for lengthy notice periods before suing government entities, it is proper to grant an interim injunction under the cited provisions and the court's inherent powers, pending determination of the main application.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction granted

Orders

  • Respondents are prohibited from demolishing the properties of the Applicant pending hearing and determination of the application.
  • No order as to costs.