20131021 TZHC Dar es Salaam

The applicant failed to adduce any credible reason for delay in applying for revision, but due to ambiguities in the mediated agreement regarding the number of beneficiaries and the amount payable, extension of time is granted solely for the purpose of verifying the exact amount due and the exact number of persons to be paid, not to deny liability.

Citation: 20131021 TZHC Dar es Salaam
Parties: Applicant: Ruby Creek Resources; Respondent: Julius Tengeneza & 10 Others
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 21 October 2013
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Revision
Outcome: Application partly granted
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Mediated Settlement, Execution of Decree, Revision of Award
Source Language: English

Labour Law Extension of Time Mediated Settlement Execution of Decree Revision of Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Ruby Creek Resources

Applicant

Julius Tengeneza & 10 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Revision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for delay in applying for revision of the mediated award
2 Whether there are grounds constituting good reason for granting the application

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application partly granted

Orders

Extension of time granted to the applicant for one week from the date of the decision to verify the exact amount due and the exact number of persons to be paid, not to deny liability.
Execution should proceed before the Registrar but may be stayed if the decree amount is deposited in court and an application is filed on time.