20010803 TZHC Arusha
The court held that the application for maintenance of status quo does not amount to a declaration of rights and is not barred by Section 11. Since the revocation is strongly contested and the applicant has been in occupation for over 14 years, the balance of convenience favors granting the injunction to preserve the status quo pending trial.
- Citation
- 20010803 TZHC Arusha
- Parties
- Applicant: Rushii Duluti Ltd.; 1st Respondent: The Hon. Commissioner for Land and Human Settlements Development; 2nd Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction
- Outcome
- Application allowed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Temporary Injunction, Status Quo Maintenance, Jurisdiction, Land Revocation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rushii Duluti Ltd.
Applicant
The Hon. Commissioner for Land and Human Settlements Development
1st Respondent
The Hon. Attorney General
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant a temporary injunction against the government
- 2 Whether maintenance of status quo pending determination of the main suit is warranted
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the application for maintenance of status quo does not amount to a declaration of rights and is not barred by Section 11. Since the revocation is strongly contested and the applicant has been in occupation for over 14 years, the balance of convenience favors granting the injunction to preserve the status quo pending trial.
Court Disposition
Application allowed with costs.
Orders
- Respondents are ordered to maintain and/or restore the status quo as of 24 January 2001 in respect of Farm No. 98/2/1 pending determination of Civil Case No. 1/2001 or for six months, whichever comes first.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment