rustamali shivji karim merani vs kamal bhushan joshi 2012 tzca 237 27 february 2012
The affidavit in support of the application is incurably defective as it contains hearsay, legal arguments, and facts not within the deponent's personal knowledge without disclosure of sources; since a valid affidavit is essential for a notice of motion, the application is incompetent and must be struck out.
- Citation
- rustamali shivji karim merani vs kamal bhushan joshi 2012 tzca 237 27 february 2012
- Parties
- Applicant: Rustamali Shivlikarim Merani; Respondent: Kamal Bhushan Joshi
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Affidavit Defects, Revision Jurisdiction, Preliminary Objection, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rustamali Shivlikarim Merani
Applicant
Kamal Bhushan Joshi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the affidavit in support of the application is incurably defective
- 2 Whether the application for revision can be sustained without a proper affidavit
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit in support of the application is incurably defective as it contains hearsay, legal arguments, and facts not within the deponent's personal knowledge without disclosure of sources; since a valid affidavit is essential for a notice of motion, the application is incompetent and must be struck out.
Court Disposition
Application struck out with costs
Orders
- The preliminary objection is sustained.
- The application is struck out with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment