ruth jerdonek vs joseph samwel sanare samwel joseph sanare 2022 tzhc 15268 13 december 2022
The affidavit is valid as the advocate had personal knowledge; attachment of judgment and decree is not mandatory; Respondent exhibited bad faith by selling properties subject to attachment and neglecting to pay the decretal sum for over nine years; conditions for arrest and detention as civil prisoner under Order...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- ruth jerdonek vs joseph samwel sanare samwel joseph sanare 2022 tzhc 15268 13 december 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Ruth Jerdonek; Respondent: Joseph Samwel Sanare @ Samwel Joseph Sanare
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Arrest and Detention of Judgment Debtor as Civil Prisoner
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Arrest and Detention of Judgment Debtor, Execution of Decree, Affidavit Requirements, Bad Faith in Execution, Bankruptcy as Defense
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ruth Jerdonek
Applicant
Joseph Samwel Sanare @ Samwel Joseph Sanare
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Arrest and Detention of Judgment Debtor as Civil Prisoner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the affidavit supporting the application is defective for failure to disclose source of information
- 2 Whether failure to attach judgment and decree renders the application incompetent
- 3 Whether conditions for arrest and detention of judgment debtor as civil prisoner are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit is valid as the advocate had personal knowledge; attachment of judgment and decree is not mandatory; Respondent exhibited bad faith by selling properties subject to attachment and neglecting to pay the decretal sum for over nine years; conditions for arrest and detention as civil prisoner under Order XXI Rule 39(2) are satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Unless the decretal amount is paid within three months from the date of order, Respondent shall be detained in prison for six months in execution of the decree in Civil Case No. 8 of 2010.
- Applicant to pay TZS 300,000 per month for Respondent's upkeep while in prison.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment