sabena technics dar es salaam ltd vs alfred kirchsten 2024 tzca 9 31 january 2024
The existence of an arguable issue of illegality regarding denial of the right to be heard due to alleged improper service of summons constitutes good cause for extension of time, regardless of deficiencies in accounting for delay.
- Citation
- sabena technics dar es salaam ltd vs alfred kirchsten 2024 tzca 9 31 january 2024
- Parties
- Applicant: Sabena Technics Dar es Salaam Ltd; Respondent: Alfred Kirchsten
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Memorandum and Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Right to Be Heard, Ex Parte Proceedings, Service of Summons, Illegality as Ground for Extension
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sabena Technics Dar es Salaam Ltd
Applicant
Alfred Kirchsten
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Memorandum and Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file memorandum and record of appeal
- 2 Whether alleged illegality in the proceedings constitutes sufficient ground for extension
Ratio Decidendi
The existence of an arguable issue of illegality regarding denial of the right to be heard due to alleged improper service of summons constitutes good cause for extension of time, regardless of deficiencies in accounting for delay.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant granted extension of sixty (60) days from the date of the ruling to lodge memorandum and record of appeal
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment