Safari Petro vs Boay Tlemu Cat Civil Application No

Safari Petro vs Boay Tlemu Cat Civil Application No

The applicant failed to account for a delay of 232 days in his affidavit, and therefore did not show good cause for extension of time as required by law. The application lacked merit and was dismissed with costs.

Citation
Safari Petro vs Boay Tlemu Cat Civil Application No
Parties
Applicant: Safari Petro; Respondent: Boaytlemmu
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Res Judicata, Appeals Procedure
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Res Judicata Appeals Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Safari Petro

Applicant

Boaytlemmu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time is properly before the Court
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for a delay of 232 days in his affidavit, and therefore did not show good cause for extension of time as required by law. The application lacked merit and was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time dismissed for want of merit with costs