19921030 TZHC Mwanza 1
The appellant was not a party to the civil suit against Bahati, and there was no evidence that the attached cattle belonged to Bahati. Therefore, the attachment of the appellant's cattle was unlawful.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19921030 TZHC Mwanza 1
- Parties
- Appellant: Sagi Magesi; Respondent: Chidgondi Mudago; Respondent: P. Sichali Suchi
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Attachment of Property, Liability for Debts of Minors, Execution of Civil Judgments
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sagi Magesi
Appellant
Chidgondi Mudago
Respondent
P. Sichali Suchi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was liable for the debt arising from the acts of Bahati, alleged to be his son or ward
- 2 Whether the attachment of the appellant's cattle was lawful given he was not a party to the original civil suit
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was not a party to the civil suit against Bahati, and there was no evidence that the attached cattle belonged to Bahati. Therefore, the attachment of the appellant's cattle was unlawful.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Attachment order revised and set aside
- Respondents to proceed against the judgment debtor with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment