said athumani vs ndugu damas 1997 tzca 36 17 november 1997

said athumani vs ndugu damas 1997 tzca 36 17 november 1997

The respondent's right of occupancy was not lawfully revoked as there was no sufficient evidence of notice or proper revocation procedure. The Resident Magistrate's Court had jurisdiction to determine the dispute. The respondent remains the lawful owner of the plot.

Citation
said athumani vs ndugu damas 1997 tzca 36 17 november 1997
Parties
Appellant: Said Athuhani; Respondent: Meichic Damas
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
17 November 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Right of Occupancy, Revocation of Title, Jurisdiction of Magistrate Courts, Declaratory Orders
Source Language
English
Property Law Land Law Right of Occupancy Revocation of Title Jurisdiction of Magistrate Courts Declaratory Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Said Athuhani

Appellant

Meichic Damas

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's right of occupancy was lawfully revoked
  2. 2 Whether the appellant or respondent is the lawful owner of the disputed plot
  3. 3 Whether the Resident Magistrate's Court had jurisdiction to determine ownership of registered land

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent's right of occupancy was not lawfully revoked as there was no sufficient evidence of notice or proper revocation procedure. The Resident Magistrate's Court had jurisdiction to determine the dispute. The respondent remains the lawful owner of the plot.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.
  • The respondent is declared the lawful owner of the disputed plot.