20131011 TZHC Arusha

Failure to cite Section 91(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act No. 6/2004 as the enabling provision rendered the application incompetent and incapable of moving the court.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: 20131011 TZHC Arusha
Parties: Applicant: Said Juma Shekimweri; Respondent: M/S Mount Meru Hotel
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 11 October 2013
Procedural Posture: Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics: Revision of CMA Award, Proper Citation of Enabling Provisions, Competency of Application
Source Language: english

Labour Law Civil Procedure Revision of CMA Award Proper Citation of Enabling Provisions Competency of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

Said Juma Shekimweri

Applicant

M/S Mount Meru Hotel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application is competent in absence of proper citation of enabling provisions for revision

Ratio Decidendi

Failure to cite Section 91(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act No. 6/2004 as the enabling provision rendered the application incompetent and incapable of moving the court.

Court Disposition

application struck out as incompetent

Orders

Application struck out for incompetence due to non-citation of enabling provision.
Applicant granted fourteen (14) days to refile a proper application.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.