20170213 TZCA Dar es Salaam

The application was filed more than three years after the decision sought to be revised, contravening Rule 65(4); no extension of time was sought; application is incompetent and struck out.

Citation: 20170213 TZCA Dar es Salaam
Parties: Applicant: Said Mohamed Mponda; Respondent: Nuru Juma; Respondent: Tanzania Revenue Authority
Court: TZCA
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 13 February 2017
Procedural Posture: Civil Application for Revision / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome: application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics: Revision, Time Barred Applications, Preliminary Objection
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Revision Time Barred Applications Preliminary Objection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

Said Mohamed Mponda

Applicant

Nuru Juma

Respondent

Tanzania Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application for Revision / Preliminary Objection Ruling

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application for revision is time-barred under Rule 65(4) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The application was filed more than three years after the decision sought to be revised, contravening Rule 65(4); no extension of time was sought; application is incompetent and struck out.

Court Disposition

application struck out as incompetent

Orders

application struck out