said ranadhani vs juma similie 2009 tzhclandd 3 19 november 2009

said ranadhani vs juma similie 2009 tzhclandd 3 19 november 2009

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for delay, did not properly verify the affidavit, did not attach the intended memorandum of appeal or notice of appeal, and failed to comply with procedural requirements.

Citation
said ranadhani vs juma similie 2009 tzhclandd 3 19 november 2009
Parties
Applicant: Said Ramadhani; Respondent: Juma Simile
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
19 November 2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Affidavit Verification, Land Disputes
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Affidavit Verification Land Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Said Ramadhani

Applicant

Juma Simile

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to appeal
  2. 2 Whether the affidavit in support of the application is properly verified

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for delay, did not properly verify the affidavit, did not attach the intended memorandum of appeal or notice of appeal, and failed to comply with procedural requirements.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs
  • Applicant to be notified of the ruling