said salim vs ramadhani kengia 2019 tzhclandd 60 12 september 2019

said salim vs ramadhani kengia 2019 tzhclandd 60 12 september 2019

The application was struck out because the applicant failed to clearly identify the decision he intended to appeal against, resulting in procedural uncertainty that prevented the court from determining the application.

Citation
said salim vs ramadhani kengia 2019 tzhclandd 60 12 september 2019
Parties
Applicant: Said Salim; Respondent: Ramadhani Kengia
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
12 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Procedural Irregularities
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Procedural Irregularities

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Said Salim

Applicant

Ramadhani Kengia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has properly identified the decision he seeks to appeal against
  2. 2 Whether the application for extension of time is maintainable given the procedural confusion

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck out because the applicant failed to clearly identify the decision he intended to appeal against, resulting in procedural uncertainty that prevented the court from determining the application.

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs

Orders

  • Application struck out
  • Applicant to pay costs