saidi ahmadi nammili vs fatuma bakari lipili 2023 tzhc 18802 6 june 2023
The appeal was dismissed because neither party appeared for multiple sessions, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- saidi ahmadi nammili vs fatuma bakari lipili 2023 tzhc 18802 6 june 2023
- Parties
- Appellant: Saidi Ahmadi Nammili; Respondent: Fatuma Bakali Lipili
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 6 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- dismissed for want of prosecution
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Non Appearance, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saidi Ahmadi Nammili
Appellant
Fatuma Bakali Lipili
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of parties
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because neither party appeared for multiple sessions, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
Court Disposition
dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- Land Appeal No.5 of 2023 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA JUDICIARY IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (MTWARA DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT MTWARA LAND APPEAL NO.5 OF 2023 (Originating from the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Mtwara at Mtwara in Misc. Land Application No. 812 of2022) SAIDI AHMADI NAMMILI........................... .......APPELLANT VERSUS FATUMA BAKALI LIPILI........................................... RESPONDENT RULING 6/6/2023 LALTAIKA, J. Dissatisfied with the decision of the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Mtwara at Mtwara delivered on the 23rd day of December 2022 before HON. NGUKULIKE, N.O., Chairman the appellant herein preferred this appeal for against the said decision. This matter came for the first time for mention on 3/2/2023 where no party appeared. Thereafter, for a total of three times (i.e 21/3/2023, 4/5/2023 today 6/6/2023) neither the appellant nor the respondent entered Page 1 of 2 appearance. What happens in the case at hand is akin to what happened in the case of STEELCOM LIMITED VS ISMAIL ISSA MBAGO AND 30 OTHERS, Labour Revision Application No.274 of 2019 where this court held that: - "Applicant filed present revision on 1st April 2019. Since the filing no appearance has ever been made despite several court orders. From the records, the applicant has lost interest in prosecuting this matter not only on the reason of non-appearance, but failure to serve the respondent as ordered by the court on 23rd April 2019. This court cannot keep on adjoining this file and return the same to the court shelves. The applicant has turned this court into a library of his client case file. Court duty is to hear and determine disputes. Applicant no appearance is glaring to prove lack of interest to prosecute the case." Having provided the appellant with the benefit of the doubt with regards to interest in prosecuting his appeal both common sense and administrative prudence dictates that this matter is ripe for dismissal for want of prosecution. Premised on the above, LAND APPEAL NO.5 OF 2023 is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. It is so ordered. 6/6/2023 Page 2 of 2