20151204 TZHC Dodoma
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not appeal the original decision in case No. 36 of 2009, making it binding and subsisting. The subsequent case No. 2 of 2010 was correctly found to be res judicata. The appeal was also filed within time, but lacked merit on substantive grounds.
- Citation
- 20151204 TZHC Dodoma
- Parties
- Appellant: Saidi Rashid; Respondent: Hamisi Shabani
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decree, Res Judicata, Appeal Timelines
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saidi Rashid
Appellant
Hamisi Shabani
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Land and Housing Tribunal erred in executing the decree despite objections by the appellant
- 2 Whether the subsequent decision in case No. 2 of 2010 was res judicata
- 3 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed time
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not appeal the original decision in case No. 36 of 2009, making it binding and subsisting. The subsequent case No. 2 of 2010 was correctly found to be res judicata. The appeal was also filed within time, but lacked merit on substantive grounds.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- appeal dismissed
- costs awarded to respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment