19920827 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
The appeal is dismissed as time-barred. The appointment of Asumini Rajabu as administratrix and the distribution of the estate are upheld, but the distribution did not comply with Islamic law and the administratrix is directed to seek expert guidance to ensure compliance.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19920827 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
- Parties
- Appellant: Saidi Timbuka; Respondent: Asumini Rajabu
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Primary Court, Appointment of Administrator, Distribution of Estate, Islamic Inheritance Law, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saidi Timbuka
Appellant
Asumini Rajabu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Primary Court had jurisdiction over property registered under the Land Registration Ordinance
- 2 Whether the appeal was time-barred
- 3 Whether the distribution of the estate complied with Islamic law
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed as time-barred. The appointment of Asumini Rajabu as administratrix and the distribution of the estate are upheld, but the distribution did not comply with Islamic law and the administratrix is directed to seek expert guidance to ensure compliance.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appointment of Asumini Rajabu as administratrix upheld
- Distribution of estate upheld but administratrix directed to involve Islamic scholars (BAQATA) for compliance with Islamic law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
J .!N THE !II<r·: COURT OF T.AN.:JI.NJ:1\. AT ~ ;§§ SALA;AM PO CIVIL APPE.llL NO. 44 OF 1990 SAID TIIMBUKA APPELl ·1UT versus .w.m:rn RAJABU RESP0N7)~ 11T On. l()th A¼tU,SJG,, •20~, MUSTAFA BIMBOKA died.. At tho time of '.)is doa·i;h, he had tiro 1·rives. One of these, Jl.SO:nit:rr :F;.'4r.Ji.B, applied for and was appointed tho a.dministra~i::: of ·i;he ,atato of hel' late husp~nd over objeotions of soma o:? tho ohl.ld~·en f>f la·i;o MUS~AFA HIMBUKA.. Tl.10 e>bjooting group wa.a led by SA.'::DI J:erJST.tu~\. m:MBUKA.t the. appolla.nt in this appeal. As noted above, ASmWtt RUAB wa.s ffll 12&1 H.Q~]2er ,,_'J!l§l -e,ppoii:1tod. by the P:d.11u1xy Couxt, Ifak:axa, IG.lo;-,17)el'O Disfa·ict tho Giuni11istratri:e of tho e::/11aJlie of MUSTAFA B.D'.iBUI~ The sarc1e v~t tn to distribute the os..,mto of the said MUSTAFA JJI.DJD!{A ::litot having OV01'1'uled a claim of ownership of one o:Z hC)uscs by L:.\~ lfi.JSJ:.A:D'J\. lWIDUXA (DW3).. SAIDI MUSTA1J1A ETITI31T.!J.. a,ppcalod to ·f.\c Distric·~ Court of IG.lo:i1bcro- Dist:rict sitting a-'.; I:.fok.ara aga.::.~1st t.hi.s c.lC'Oisian. On ,9,tl\ JH+.Y• ;i.288, this appeal was a.bandonod,, . Mr. Mral~a, leax1wcl advocate for the apl)ellan-ii subni ttc:-:ls ·~ tt r havo ~ a1Jo11don all our grounds of appeal but 0.11.l,Y' one rc~ar:ding the poi11. G . tr! law. Und0.1: a..18(1)(a)(i) of the Mag:i.sti:atos Courts Act wl1ieh p:rovidos that a Prtmrry Court shall have no jurisdiction i11 ~ proooocli..'l'l.&;s aff ooting the ti tlc in any land registc:i:: cd under tho Land RegirrtJ:a.tion Ordinance. :fore is a. !JC::"rl.ficato f'>f Right of 8ccu.pru.1.a,:r in respect of a house an Flot . No. 247 B1.00:: 0 Ifalta.ra Minor· So·~-i:;lcaont issued on 15/6/81 which is one o:c -'.;he property in -'i;l1e osJi;ate of tho deceased Mustafa llii.i1lJU:;;a. So i.n view of tJJ.c.t eccUon the mattcx ought to have been bxot1.ght :i.11. tho DistricJc C.turt. We arc t'h..Gro:foro att'lx11i tting that the ].)J;OOOcdings should ~ c,(IUl.Shed and. the mattcx heard de novo in tho District Court." . • :; . ,,. . .:,.-,.. J .. ;,., :·~ '.. Y, .~ .• ';. , -2- Mr0 Kashu.i-nbtigu, lo2r11ccl advocate for Aff"u1UFI RAJ1LB'C 1 the appointod ac1uhti.S"t:catri:x: of tho estate o~: mJSIJ:i.1\.,1:'A R!J.ffi'U:CA. supported the view oocprossod by Mr. ~!i,r81~Lsw.1gura.. 'L:10 f:i.:rst ~P?Ollato c0ttri ~ulcdt " 1)()-'i;h parties ngrcc tha-t tJ.1.c -',;:dcl flJ.s •ou:rt had no jurisdiction ·i:;o ;.,.oar th.is su:t:t in which a part of the estate pr~)cri;~r nmnoly a house is ai tuc.tcd on a XCG'istercd lond, the trie..J. 001..U't prooccdings ore hereby quashed. The parties arc at liberty to proocod afresh in a court of oompctcnJ,; jm'isclic-tion if they so wish.. 1f T\10 submission l)j" Mr. Mt,rakD.sungu.ra had no basis in laxr 4 I eou:rt ha.d juxiscliotion -'i:;o hondle t:10 probtvbe matJi;cr .. It 1TO.S M realization of this. ·i;hat Mx. Knshumbt'.[;11 applied for the r1vicn ~ t11c first n.ppellatc 1s court decision o:f qu.r..shing -'Gho tria::. Oo-t.U:t'1a d.ocisi~ '0ti gs_-'i;I, lia,yCD1b9r• 1982 -tho ;eixot. c.,ppe~te court s·tated& " In v.tow of tho su1:mission ;!le.de bj.. the applicontfs advocate tJ.ris 001..u:t is sa:iJ.s:Zied with the reasons pr•J; :Zoi"traxd tha-'i; J1t1.c l'Llling of this cottrt 11i·;;J1 O<l!lscnt by both oounsol that tho tricl. 001..u:t ha.d no jurisdiction to hear the o:rigi~-utl mat·~o:r lTas oontrnry to lro-r ~ 'I accordingly order th2-t -~ho miginal app~-il. in the matter m~.5 of l9C8 should be ~cvivod ond be ho a.rd ancl dc·~cr.ati.ncd m its na~its. No erdor is maclo ~s to costs.ff !'Tho :~ovivod" e.,pp~l ifas on 11th Mrix~Ii,.122£ d i ~ d iti.t!l (}OEf·AJ fF nen apPcD:rN'lOo of the appellant. ~10 appeal to JLihis con~t iJ nQt against -'~h.o d:i,.r;[.nissal of the "rcvivod11 appeal i.o. th.o 17-th • ~l'1.t'cll, 1990 d.ocisiani it is ~nst ·fuo clooiston of _g5th l~oycw~i ~ ' Tt-re grounds of f'..ppoal have been filed 1).Y Hr. }tvra.kasungu:i:a fm SAIDI IIDIBUKA. "I. The Loamed Pr:tncipal ni,.stxiot Ma.gistxa.tc o:,;~·od in law and in fac-'li in invold.ng tho provisions of the Civil P.r-.cccl.eyc Code, 1966 when the proper lc.u applicable for ll.ppoals and matters origj.11.a;~ing :f:r:om JlA1.1.o P-.cimnxy C"u.rts was .,li11c Oi vil Proood.urc (Appeals in Proooadinga ori&,im~:~ing in .J -3- Bl:imro::y Couxt its providod in ,. G.. N.312 of J.964. 2. 1!.ic Learmid Principal Dis-'Grict Ma.gistrdo 1 or::cc1 in law and in fad in Iov.tcwing t_i.o ma;i;·~o~ whon it had no jurisclio•cion." ,. J3cf ore ,ae, itr. lltralcas1x,1gura olaboxntcd on the -~ro f:. l ,d grou11.ds of appeals submitting on -'i;ho second grounc1 of appo21 ';1iat tho P--"~por court ·:f o:r the xoviow was tho High Cou.r·:; ru.1c1 nb ; tho District Oouxt. Mr. MtvakastU1@,'Ul'a did not ad.w.noo his Q[;SO by pccifioa, ho 1-Tas contoht 1i':i:l;h gcnorall tic~ as blttlinod al)O~io, Mr,, Jre,sl1~1b~-iu, . iii 1ttopiv subrtittod ·that tho ~edl was timo ba.r:rod c:~s it had l:>ocn tiled i~90 ·":' more tlid.n 45 clo$s after: ·i.hc decision had boon ~i 23:r-c\ Ap~il, ~ cp 25tl} Nov~g. 1 J989,.,· Rb wont on .,i;o st1.br1i:1/i; -'d1at ·::,he High Oou;rt h::il ponc~_s to rovisc lnri. not ionow the dccisi<111s of the Diat:dc-'.; Court. IIc P:,:tlJ'od for the cli::titlssal of the llPPCtw. wi-~h oos-G:,.. b:1 the qt,tcs-'liion ot t:lc appeal haviiig 1)0011 time barred, M:r. lvlliaI:l:l.oungura r,ubnrl,·~·~oEl J~mt -'i,h,o ti,ppollant had_ come to lca1'11 of the decision d 2!ithJro-,·~lb~, ... ~ .• c..1 iat Ap:dl, J.990 ~ i;~gJ_t{tgl,y: took ei.cps -'~o appeal to this oow:t~ Tho record shows th2.:;; ·i;b.c appeal was :N.lccl ·'-lll- ~ Am.i l,t 19.2Q. and. no-~ on 23x'd J\.pril, 1990 as sub:ni ttcd by it:. K,_'\fiihurabugu Ol' 24th. .Ap:cil, l990 µ.s. submi ttod 1Jy Ia .. llt,rakasui'lgl.U'a. I have dcli1Jora;i;cly detailed tho chcqu.c:c·ccl history of -',;!Jis oaso far on.so of w1.c10:r1;riiru.1cli11g it and to sec j_f Hr~ ICasl1ur11bugu. 1:1 stt1Jr,1issio11 of -~:10 appeal havine; been time barred is borne 01.,\t. Tho r"so:rtl bc~s OL1.·~ -'i.b.o submissio11.~ ~ the ;record furthor shous ·;;hat -the c:.)pellont 1 ll.D!'l an 25/11 /89 been repxoscntod by his y0Lu1gor b:i:o"lihcl! Hn.ss~:11. Htud;o.:/:~, Ilimbulm (DU3). The :2i:rs.,c appellate cou:rt maclc the decision 0:1 tllo Stw7.c fuW• It is !to·~ correct thn/i: the appollrur~ ooao to la10w c:f -'i.his d.ooj_ijion on Ist Apxil, 1990. I thus holcl t:w.:~ ·;.1.:!.~S appeal is ·-:Um.o ba.r:rccl. It is c1isnri.ssod 1rith costs. lll1c .effect of c1ianissing tho appeal is upliolcU.11.g the clco:;.cio11. ot -~he .,i;rial colll't -~hr:,:~ had been nadc Ol"l. 12th. ll,o;v:cn1,:Rcx, 198'.t,. Cl ~.l-ig tll.l'ot'lg1_1 -the proccocl.ings, tliat court hacl in -'~he p:.:ooess ri1ad.c t\ro pro~cdu:ral errosa t:1.0 r,mttcr before it 1rn,s f o:.: -'lihc n,ppointi:1011-'.; of a.11 rldin:ilri.stxatrix of the cstak of MUSTiJ!'A IffiDJUICA.. The cou.:c:~t did more -'~an tha-'i; -: ~~. ~<m~ on to hcnx and d,c·~.c~~ .~ objocti.011 ov·or £1J'l inal1.-1.m.011 in-'i,o -~~1c crrGo.:~c of -'iihc dcccasocl o:Z a ~J.Ottsc :clm;:ncd -~o :1avo bQ0~1 ""110 pxoperty of Y.:faSSANI MUSTf.Fli. ITIHBD1CL (:1J1T3) 1 an.cl mo dis~~z:32.1.~ :th,o. Sfid os·~v/i,c> '11ho followed Ol' adop-'~d procotluro ·,as irzoS'U,1ro:. The court shonlcl ~ ha.vo dotcrminccl a·~ t.1.rn:c sto.gc :;.1ic e,pplioa.ti021 · for the appQ:i.11tnont of an o.dminstratar of -~ho estat<. nf rflJST..'I.FA In:MBUI{Ao Once -'vho 001.,U't a.ppoin.,i;s the acti1inistrator ·:;hen it is ·te that nc1minist:-cat0l' that is left the clu.ty -'1;0 clistribu-ct "tl1.<3 cs-'-.ate of tho deccn.sccl .,,o the entitled. In tho the trin.l cou.x-'v S:.1ould first hiwe clc·~onaincd t;_1e issu o:~ 1rho uns to be appointccl -'lihc ndministra.tor of the cstc.:l.c of :t-:W$1LI1'A ::~TID3U:UI..,. Ifoving appointccl ASUMIWI MJABU' as the 0C.ministro:triz of -'.;he os·~atc, 1-~ should hcvc lott to her tho duty .,GO c.1.ist:d butc it, O'.ijcc•~ion p:r-occcd.ings by -~he a,ppcllnnt should -'.;hen havo been clcc.1 t scpozt'.to1.y. In this rcspcc·t it· hn.s been hc1d by· -'Ghis oou:r-'u thn.t n, ec})'.'.XGto 1'a.so file be opcncc1. fa: au.eh Pl'OOOcdings ·... c. vi<ll·T ·l;h2,t I do nr -'i; s.hnro. i. I hold tho:'.; such r.. stc~ enhances protif'iQc:~011 of li·!;igc.:'... Lon.s ond. ie too tcehnicc-.t ~- r;~n~ cf'~ ,-:,ZbM.t"io-i:-.e:~ b~,- -l;h..c : :i:•:t~~ . Oou.rts. But n.o s·~n.-~cd cJ)ovo, the tricl cot'.Z:ti'-·Tfl',;od mruw iost'es togothcx~ T'J1csa orror:i I hold did .not -Dc.czi.siOJ.1 c.. 1i1isonx:ringc of jnstico or in wy wcy projttdioo o.,ey of tho poxtics r:ml ccrtninly ~ the e,ppc11~t. 'J!1c pro-tics b1c,ir whn.t wn.s at issue 2,ncl presented their e:~scs :f:\.tlJ.y., On the mn.tcric:.1 before the court, the n,~)poi11tme11t of .l~S'mur Ri.JABU ns the n.dmi11is..,.;I2,-'.;rj;c of the ostn:k of ItTSS:.ti3'A IDHBUict. un.s ~-;J:oPQr. Al.so proper1 ~1. the evidence before i·~ 1r2.c ·~ho diomisscl. o:Z -:;ho elclm by nr3.. ~- the. diatributn.JliiOll ot ·t:.10 cstc,-'iie by the ·i .tid . court instcc.d of st t.':l<l ap:p~ntcd c.d.miltla..,.;ra,'txix \T~s n,o-'r ~OJ.::--:::1:'.i the 1~ puts thn,-'li dttt~r on the ndministrr,:'i;Q.T who lrd;cr ~i-'lllrln_ upocLHod I• poriod in the ltlt) .reports t~ court 011. how t!1.a:t du-',y hr..cl boon (3.isohoxgodJ and fw:·i:ihcr the triol. Q0,1.trt lmd. 110~ dis:t:ti~tccl -'me os·i:irt.tc properly i.e. in o.ccordnncc wit:1 the :t'elcvruit le;;r. The lCJr nriplicnb1c i·n the distr1bt\"~Ol1. of the es-cr:k ot MU.::TAFA IID-IBUXA is Islcaio ltil·l'• The talmnic 'lmt. of i11hcntoncc could. be very tcclurl.ccl. In -'i;ho pxcf.lon-t .oo.sc, the cstc.tc wn.s not clistl:'f 7)utad ' ~ 111 accord.nnco ui·~:.2 -'i;hc/i; l~r., . The dis,ci;bt.t·~ian. never cfonsicloj;ccl uho ll'cro the real hcixs under the Islamic lclT ... even the W.,.(i:1'1.i tlc:,d were I '-. . :· . givcin somotltlngs. '1!1.0 die~ri bu.ti on ua,s i10-'.; done in co-i,1plin..1cc with .~: ! _I -5- the oxdmnod por"tionsi quotas were not ii.1 accordanc ~ wit!.~ wha-'li -'i;hc Holy Q..1l'an dictates and lastly, J.;hc clistri outio.. was no-'a 00i11plctcd as :i:~ s>.ould have been done, ·- These axe p1 :,i)c:d;ics pu-'G aside for Li.so of :lihc very young hcix·s up to the Li.mo they booomc aduUs when that property was then to be dist:!:' .bt.,.tccl~ 1 rr'his approach is nowhere in the '8-u'ru.1 mxcb,o:dsod. T.:1, c1Y;;i:r·c os-i;2.to sho1.1lcl. hav-o boon ·dist:ributcd to all that axe o:J~:i.tlccl to inhcti t under tho QJ.ran; tho minors r slwxcs 1rould thc:1 :111vc l)ocn l . ~ after by a tri:1,Er~oo up to the time thr~-~ minor becomes an LclJ.11"~. Tho mainto·nanoo of -~hose minors a:rc taken oaxc of out of the i:i: inhcri t.Dncoc sec 'E.10 HolY Q.l;'an, er.-.: 1.~t :r JJ'ol.tl:& Ni s, :.::·. vc'0; :cs 2 ~ 35,. Tho Islomio law of inhcri tan.cc is VCIY dctaiicd o.nc~ epocifio .. The appointed ildministrn:tru: I!l!:\Y B.Qi be aoC[ltnintcd Hi th :tho clotcils. Sho is thus aclvised to seek cxpe:rt opinion of the Muslh: foholaJ:'s on this eubjcc•:;, llillGIATA c..auld bo -..~ 11.anc\Y' in such hd. cs. The trial court is c1skcd to assist the acl.nu.111.s-'_;::rat:d.x to con·~ ~o-~ BiulllA'l1Jr. on the issue 2,nc.l. ·i;o Ji;h6l be gi vcn tho cltli;cils 'of what the tlocor"sod estate is compooocl of, tho value of tile cs·~o,·i;cj list of tho hchs ru.td their gcndor (male or f cmalc) and -~heir :relationship -'i;o -~he dcccoscd c 11 g, tti:Zc, daughtc:r, son, i"i1o"lihoIJ fa:iihcr etc, :JA:'JTA}A would trork ouJG who gc·Gs what in complfa.nco wit:1 ·l;hc OI'wiincd. q;.1.0-~e.a for ·hl1c tt.dminis.,li:cc:,tr:b: -'Go distribute. In smnt11ury, t!1c appeal is di smi osod nHh. cofd;s,. T~1 1 - ~~~1poiniiucn!:, of ASUMiliJI RiiJ'i{i}U as the administ:ro..tri:;: of -'Gho osfa,to of ;.ru[::L'i.:;?A !¼]. as tho distribtr;;;i.011 of' the· cstntc of lW11.1-'\l:'A l'IEIBUIC.'1. is u.phcld4 HUIBUKA was no·~ c1.onc in accordanco wHh -;;:1.0 IIolY Qxron, i ·~ L:; ;Jc·i; n.oidc and the [1):1.mi1u.st:ratrix o.sltcd to ilwolvo 'BAIOATA in ·t1.is c:cotciso on above mon·aoncci. lines. JUDGE 27/8/92 Gor~. - Rµ.bnma, J. Pm·i;:l,cs · n.hsen-'i; .Jt'\dg1ncnt deli vcroc1.. ••••••./6 '-· . ,_ . • - 6 9.ldor1 Tho Rcgistrn.t' is hereby t1.skcc7. to ooimTilliUl d.tc tho decision af tho cou:rt to -'chc parties, ~~,J':.·-----,"" ~ -- -'\:.::. ~~- :k ,:,.,.__,. YJIHI'A au:mlu JUDGE 27/8/<)2 \