kitenge vs mshoro 2005 tzhc 67 8 december 2005
It was wrong for the mediator to enter judgment in favour of the plaintiff on a date fixed for mediation and in the absence of the defendant; the refusal to set aside the ex-parte judgment was not supported by the record.
- Citation
- kitenge vs mshoro 2005 tzhc 67 8 december 2005
- Parties
- Appellant: Salama O. Kitenge; Respondent: Sophia Mshoro
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Mediation Procedure, Right to Be Heard
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Salama O. Kitenge
Appellant
Sophia Mshoro
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it was proper for the mediator to enter judgment in favour of the plaintiff on a date fixed for mediation and in the absence of the defendant
- 2 Whether the refusal to set aside the ex-parte judgment was justified
Ratio Decidendi
It was wrong for the mediator to enter judgment in favour of the plaintiff on a date fixed for mediation and in the absence of the defendant; the refusal to set aside the ex-parte judgment was not supported by the record.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Original case file to be sent back to the Court of the Resident Magistrate at Kisutu for mediation before another mediator
- If mediation fails, the case to proceed to trial before another Magistrate with competent jurisdiction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment