20060406 TZCA Dar es Salaam3
The preliminary objection was rejected because the 1st respondent had already filed a substantive application (Civil Application No. 149 of 2005) under Rule 82 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979, seeking the same relief on the same grounds. Good administration of justice requires that the substantive application be heard first.
- Citation
- 20060406 TZCA Dar es Salaam3
- Parties
- Applicant: Salum Amri Kiria; 1st Respondent: Nassoro Hassan Taratibu; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 6 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection in Application for Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection rejected with costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Preliminary Objection, Appeal Procedure, Service of Notice, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Salum Amri Kiria
Applicant
Nassoro Hassan Taratibu
1st Respondent
The Attorney General
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection in Application for Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the preliminary objection on procedural grounds is valid to strike out the application for stay of execution
- 2 Whether the applicant complied with procedural requirements for service and filing in the appeal process
Ratio Decidendi
The preliminary objection was rejected because the 1st respondent had already filed a substantive application (Civil Application No. 149 of 2005) under Rule 82 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979, seeking the same relief on the same grounds. Good administration of justice requires that the substantive application be heard first.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection rejected with costs in the cause.
Orders
- Preliminary objection dismissed.
- Costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment