land appeal no
The executing tribunal acted ultra vires by issuing orders and directives not contained in the original decree, including appointing a broker and ordering attachment and sale of property, thereby materially altering the terms of the decree and exceeding its jurisdiction as an executing court.
- Citation
- land appeal no
- Parties
- Appellant: Salum Mahege; 1st Respondent: Bi. Grace Dibibi; 2nd Respondent: Bi. Ombeni Dibibi
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decrees, Jurisdiction of Executing Court, Scope of Execution Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Salum Mahege
Appellant
Bi. Grace Dibibi
1st Respondent
Bi. Ombeni Dibibi
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the executing tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by issuing new orders not contained in the original decree
- 2 Whether the appointment of a broker and orders for attachment and sale of property were lawful in execution proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The executing tribunal acted ultra vires by issuing orders and directives not contained in the original decree, including appointing a broker and ordering attachment and sale of property, thereby materially altering the terms of the decree and exceeding its jurisdiction as an executing court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Orders and directives of the executing tribunal are set aside.
- Case file to be remitted to the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Mkuranga for execution afresh before another Chairperson.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment