samna t investment ltd vs fast forward international ltd 2020 tzhc 2001 13 march 2020

samna t investment ltd vs fast forward international ltd 2020 tzhc 2001 13 march 2020

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide sufficient evidence or proof of alleged illegality. Negligence or lack of diligence by advocate does not constitute sufficient cause for extension of time.

Citation
samna t investment ltd vs fast forward international ltd 2020 tzhc 2001 13 march 2020
Parties
Applicant: SAMNA (T) Investment Ltd; Respondent: Fast Forward International Ltd
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal, Negligence, Illegality
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SAMNA (T) Investment Ltd

Applicant

Fast Forward International Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause exists for extension of time to file appeal out of time
  2. 2 Whether applicant accounted for each day of delay
  3. 3 Whether alleged illegality constitutes sufficient cause

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide sufficient evidence or proof of alleged illegality. Negligence or lack of diligence by advocate does not constitute sufficient cause for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time dismissed
  • Applicant to pay costs