samwel mgonja vs total t limited 2018 tzca 383 8 february 2018
The respondent, having complied with Rule 90 by timely applying for documents and copying the request to the applicant, cannot be legally blamed for not prosecuting the appeal when the court failed to supply the documents or inform the respondent they were ready; thus, Rule 89(2) cannot be engaged to strike out the notice of appeal.
- Citation
- samwel mgonja vs total t limited 2018 tzca 383 8 february 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Samwel Mgonja; Respondent: Total (T) Limited
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Notice of Appeal, Court Registry Practice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samwel Mgonja
Applicant
Total (T) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to take essential steps to prosecute the appeal by not lodging the appeal within the prescribed period after documents were ready for collection
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent, having complied with Rule 90 by timely applying for documents and copying the request to the applicant, cannot be legally blamed for not prosecuting the appeal when the court failed to supply the documents or inform the respondent they were ready; thus, Rule 89(2) cannot be engaged to strike out the notice of appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment