sarah haonga others vs viettel tanzania ltd 2020 tzhcld 91 24 april 2020
The applicants met the requirements for a representative suit under Rule 44(2) of the Labour Court Rules, as they have a common interest, have appointed a representative, and have provided evidence of their authorization. Leave is therefore granted.
- Citation
- sarah haonga others vs viettel tanzania ltd 2020 tzhcld 91 24 april 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Sarah Haonga; Applicant: Pendo Nyembeke; Applicant: Raphael George; Respondent: Viettel Tanzania Ltd
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Representative Suit
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Representative Suits, Leave to File Representative Action, Labour Disputes, Court Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Haonga
Applicant
Pendo Nyembeke
Applicant
Raphael George
Applicant
Viettel Tanzania Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Representative Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have sufficient reasons to be granted leave to file a representative suit
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants met the requirements for a representative suit under Rule 44(2) of the Labour Court Rules, as they have a common interest, have appointed a representative, and have provided evidence of their authorization. Leave is therefore granted.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Leave granted to file representative suit
- Sarah Haonga appointed to represent other applicants in the intended revision application arising from CMA Labour Dispute No. CMA/DSM/ILA/R.14/17
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment