20171130 TZHC Dodoma5
The appellant failed to prove that the late Bakari Swalehe Mgange owned the disputed land or that the respondent's evidence was forged or improperly admitted; the respondent's claim was supported by credible documentary evidence and legal principles of succession and occupancy; the trial tribunal's findings were correct and not tainted by error or bias.
- Citation
- 20171130 TZHC Dodoma5
- Parties
- Appellant: Saumu Bakari Swalehe; Respondent: Maulidi Gamaha
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Right of Occupancy, Burden of Proof, Succession, Ownership of Land, Evidence Evaluation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saumu Bakari Swalehe
Appellant
Maulidi Gamaha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent lawfully acquired ownership of the disputed land after the death of Zuhura Swalehe Gamaha
- 2 Whether the appellant proved that the late Bakari Swalehe Mgange owned the disputed land
- 3 Whether the evidence presented by the respondent was forged or improperly admitted
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove that the late Bakari Swalehe Mgange owned the disputed land or that the respondent's evidence was forged or improperly admitted; the respondent's claim was supported by credible documentary evidence and legal principles of succession and occupancy; the trial tribunal's findings were correct and not tainted by error or bias.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment