ajavon v benin application no 0132017 2019 afchpr 12 29 march 2019
The Court found that the Respondent State violated the Applicant's rights to a fair trial, including the right to be tried by a competent court, the right to defence, the right to be informed of charges, the right to be represented by counsel, the right to presumption of innocence, the right to two-tier jurisdiction, the right to property, the right to equal protection of the law, and the right to the independence of the judiciary. The Court held that the establishment and operation of CRIET, the administrative actions against the Applicant's companies, and the conduct of criminal proceedings were in breach of the African Charter and international human rights standards.
- Citation
- ajavon v benin application no 0132017 2019 afchpr 12 29 march 2019
- Parties
- Applicant: Sebastien Germain Ajavon; Respondent State: Republic of Benin
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application (merits) Before the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights / Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; violations found; reparations to be determined at a later stage.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Trial, Right to Property, Right to Liberty and Security, Right to Dignity and Reputation, Non Bis in Idem, Equality Before the Law, Independence of the Judiciary, Right to Two Tier Jurisdiction, Presumption of Innocence, Right to Defence, Right to Be Informed of Charges, Right to Access Case File, Right to Be Represented by Counsel, Right to Equal Protection of the Law, Non Discrimination
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sebastien Germain Ajavon
Applicant
Republic of Benin
Respondent State
Procedural Posture
Application (merits) Before the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights / Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant's rights to a fair trial, property, liberty, dignity, equality, and judicial protection were violated by the Respondent State in the context of criminal proceedings and administrative actions.
- 2 Whether the establishment and operation of the Anti-Economic Crimes and Terrorism Court (CRIET) and related laws violated the Applicant's rights under the African Charter and international instruments.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Respondent State violated the Applicant's rights to a fair trial, including the right to be tried by a competent court, the right to defence, the right to be informed of charges, the right to be represented by counsel, the right to presumption of innocence, the right to two-tier jurisdiction, the right to property, the right to equal protection of the law, and the right to the independence of the judiciary. The Court held that the establishment and operation of CRIET, the administrative actions against the Applicant's companies, and the conduct of criminal proceedings were in breach of the African Charter and international human rights standards.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; violations found; reparations to be determined at a later stage.
Orders
- Objections to jurisdiction and admissibility dismissed.
- Application declared admissible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment