seko samwel vs republic 2005 tzca 101 11 march 2005

seko samwel vs republic 2005 tzca 101 11 march 2005

Both the evidence of the child witness (PW 2) and the cautioned statement (Exh. P3) were unreliable and tainted with doubt; the conviction was unsafe as the requirements for admissibility and corroboration were not met.

Citation
seko samwel vs republic 2005 tzca 101 11 march 2005
Parties
Appellant: Seko Samwel; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence by High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Legal Topics
Murder, Confession Evidence, Child Witness, Corroboration, Admissibility of Evidence
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Seko Samwel

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence by High Court

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge properly admitted and relied on the evidence of a child of tender years (PW 2)
  2. 2 Whether the retracted/repudiated confession was properly admitted and could be relied upon for conviction
  3. 3 Whether the conviction was safe given the evidentiary doubts

Ratio Decidendi

Both the evidence of the child witness (PW 2) and the cautioned statement (Exh. P3) were unreliable and tainted with doubt; the conviction was unsafe as the requirements for admissibility and corroboration were not met.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.

Orders

  • Conviction for murder quashed
  • Sentence of death set aside