mouvement des refugies mauritaniens au senegal v senegal communication 162 of 1997 1997 achpr 4 11 november 1997
The complainant failed to demonstrate exhaustion of local remedies or that such remedies were unavailable or unduly prolonged, and did not specify which Charter provisions were allegedly violated. The facts presented did not prima facie establish State responsibility.
- Citation
- mouvement des refugies mauritaniens au senegal v senegal communication 162 of 1997 1997 achpr 4 11 november 1997
- Parties
- Complainant: Mouvement des Réfugiés Mauritaniens au Sénégal; Respondent: Sénégal
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Communication / Admissibility Decision
- Outcome
- communication declared inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Communication, Exhaustion of Local Remedies, Treatment of Refugees
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mouvement des Réfugiés Mauritaniens au Sénégal
Complainant
Sénégal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the communication is admissible under Article 56(5) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
- 2 Whether local remedies were exhausted
- 3 Whether the facts alleged establish a prima facie violation by the State
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant failed to demonstrate exhaustion of local remedies or that such remedies were unavailable or unduly prolonged, and did not specify which Charter provisions were allegedly violated. The facts presented did not prima facie establish State responsibility.
Court Disposition
communication declared inadmissible
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment