union nationale des syndicate autonomes du senegal v senegal communication 226 of 1999 2000 achpr 28 6 november 2000

union nationale des syndicate autonomes du senegal v senegal communication 226 of 1999 2000 achpr 28 6 november 2000

The communication was declared inadmissible because the complainant had not exhausted all available domestic remedies as required by Article 56(5) of the African Charter.

Citation
union nationale des syndicate autonomes du senegal v senegal communication 226 of 1999 2000 achpr 28 6 november 2000
Parties
Complainant: Union Nationale des Syndicats Autonomes du Sénégal (UNSAS); Respondent: Senegal
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
6 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Communication / Admissibility Decision
Outcome
Inadmissible
Legal Topics
Exhaustion of Local Remedies, Arbitrary Arrest, Right to Counsel, Freedom of Association, Socio Economic Rights
Source Language
English
Human Rights Law Labour Law Exhaustion of Local Remedies Arbitrary Arrest Right to Counsel Freedom of Association Socio Economic Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Union Nationale des Syndicats Autonomes du Sénégal (UNSAS)

Complainant

Senegal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Communication / Admissibility Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant exhausted all available domestic remedies as required by Article 56(5) of the African Charter
  2. 2 Whether the facts alleged constitute violations of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The communication was declared inadmissible because the complainant had not exhausted all available domestic remedies as required by Article 56(5) of the African Charter.

Court Disposition

Inadmissible