Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

Ruling Seni

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to file written submissions as ordered, amounting to failure to prosecute.

Court disposition

Application dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • Application dismissed for want of prosecution without cost

02

Material facts

Parties

Seni Mahigu Seni

Applicant Counsel: Silas John

Mansoor Industries Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Innocent Bernard

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Labour Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Respondent
The respondent argued that the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to file written submissions as ordered by the court.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Laemthong Rice Co. Ltd Vs. Principal Secretary Ministry of Finance Zanzibar, Civil Appeal No. 259 of 2019; Mary Joseph Vs. Rachel Zephania, Misc. Land Application No. 37 of 2020; Kiputo S/o Ahmad Vs. Mariki S/o Mpenda & 3 Others Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2021; Winfrida Lazaro Zabron Vs. Ryaga Yuda Ryaga & 6 Others, Civil Case No. 30 of 2022; Godfrey Kimbe Vs. Peter Ngonyani, Civil Appeal No. 41 of 2014

    Court orders must be respected; failure to file written submissions is tantamount to non-appearance and warrants dismissal for want of prosecution.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to file written submissions as ordered, amounting to failure to prosecute.

Court disposition

Application dismissed for want of prosecution

  • Application dismissed for want of prosecution without cost

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 10 May 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 10 May 2024

Ruling Seni

THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE SUB-REGISTRY OF MWANZA

AT MWANZA LABOUR REVISION NO. 13183 OF 2024 (Original Labor Dispute No. CMA/MZ/NYAM/125/2023/066/2023) SENI MAHIGU SENI ..................................................................... APPLICANT

VERSUS MANSOOR INDUSTRIES LTD ................................................... RESPONDENT

RULING 3rd & 29th November, 2024 CHUMA, J The applicant Seni Mahigu Seni is aggrieved with the decisions of the CMA in Labour dispute No. CMA/MZ/NYAM/125/2023/066/2023 dated 10th day of May, 2024 by Hon. Msuwakollo. The applicant has preferred the instant application seeking this Court to revise the said Arbitral awards, quash and set aside the Arbitral proceedings and their resultant award and or orders and any other orders this court may deem fit to grant. This application was ordered to be disposed of by way of the written submission. According to the scheduling order, the applicant ought to file his submission on 30.10.2024, reply on 13.11.2024 and rejoinder if any by 20.11.2024, and ruling on 29.11.2024. 1 However, the available submission is that of the respondent filed by Mr. Innocent Bernard advocate for the respondent. In his submission he urged this court to dismiss the application for want of prosecution for failure of the applicant to file submission. Having gone through the record, there is no doubt as submitted by Mr. Innocent advocate for the respondent the applicant failed to file his submission for unknown reasons as per the ordered schedule. It has been held countless times that court orders must be respected. See the cases of Laemthong Rice Co. Ltd Vs. Principal Secretary Ministry of Finance Zanzibar, Civil Appeal No. 259 of 2019; and Mary Joseph Vs. Rachel

Zephania, Misc. Land Application No. 37 of 2020. It is also beyond doubt as correctly argued by Mr. Innocent's advocate for the applicant that, failure to file written submissions as ordered by the court is tantamount to non-appearance in court on the date fixed for the hearing. See the case of Kiputo S/o Ahmad Vs. Mariki S/o Mpenda & 3 Others Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2021 (unreported) on page 5, last paragraph and page 6 last paragraph, Winfrida Lazaro Zabron Vs. Ryaga Yuda Ryaga & 6 Others, Civil Case No. 30 of 2022 (unreported), on pages 4 and 5and Godfrey Kimbe 2 Vs. Peter Ngonyani, Civil Appeal No. 41 of 2014 (unreported). Therefore, because the applicant failed to file his submission in chief in total disregard of the court order he has failed to prosecute his application. For the reasons considered and stated herein above, I dismiss this application for want of prosecution without cost. DATED at MWANZA this 29th day of November, 2024 W.M. CHUMA

JUDGE 3 Ruling delivered virtually in court before Mr. Silas John advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Innocent Bernard advocate for the respondent this 29th day of November, 2024. C. KISONGO

DEPUTY REGISTRAR 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Laemthong Rice Co. Ltd Vs. Principal Secretary Ministry of Finance Zanzibar, Civil Appeal No. 259 of 2019

Case cited

Mary Joseph Vs. Rachel Zephania, Misc. Land Application No. 37 of 2020

Case cited

Kiputo S/o Ahmad Vs. Mariki S/o Mpenda & 3 Others Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2021

Case cited

Winfrida Lazaro Zabron Vs. Ryaga Yuda Ryaga & 6 Others, Civil Case No. 30 of 2022

Case cited

Godfrey Kimbe Vs. Peter Ngonyani, Civil Appeal No. 41 of 2014

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.