19850114 TZHC Dar es Salaam
There are no sufficient mitigating factors to warrant interference with the sentence; the sentence of one year imprisonment is neither excessive nor wrong, and the application for revision is refused.
- Citation
- 19850114 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The United Republic; Accused: Ally Mohamed Mgoa
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for revision of sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Juvenile Offenders, Minimum Sentences Act, Probation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The United Republic
Prosecutor
Ally Mohamed Mgoa
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the accused should be revised to probation
- 2 Whether the Minimum Sentences Act applies to the accused given his age
Ratio Decidendi
There are no sufficient mitigating factors to warrant interference with the sentence; the sentence of one year imprisonment is neither excessive nor wrong, and the application for revision is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for revision of sentence refused
Orders
- No change to the sentence; application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment