Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19920701 TZHC Dar es Salaam2

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The sentence of three years' imprisonment was illegal as it exceeded the statutory maximum of twelve months or a fine not exceeding two thousand shillings; the sentence was quashed and substituted with a sentence resulting in immediate release.

Court disposition

Sentence quashed and substituted with sentence resulting in immediate release.

Orders

  • The sentence of three years' imprisonment is quashed.
  • The accused is sentenced to a term resulting in immediate release.

02

Material facts

Parties

The Republic

Prosecutor Counsel: Mrs. Slaa

Abdallah Kagito alias Mnyamwegi

Accused

Amounts and remedies

  • Maximum Fine Under Statute: TZS 2,000
  • Maximum Imprisonment Under Statute (months): 12
  • Original Sentence (years): 3

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Revision / Judgment on Revision

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The sentence imposed was illegal as it exceeded the statutory maximum and did not provide the option of a fine.
Respondent
No argument recorded from the respondent.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Cultivation of Noxious Plants (Prohibition) Ordinance, Cap. 134 s.2(b)

    A sentence must not exceed the statutory maximum prescribed by law for the offence.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The sentence of three years' imprisonment was illegal as it exceeded the statutory maximum of twelve months or a fine not exceeding two thousand shillings; the sentence was quashed and substituted with a sentence resulting in immediate release.

Court disposition

Sentence quashed and substituted with sentence resulting in immediate release.

  • The sentence of three years' imprisonment is quashed.
  • The accused is sentenced to a term resulting in immediate release.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 1 July 1992

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 1 July 1992

19920701 TZHC Dar es Salaam2

--.__:. L, fJ. I< tJ- /?~I Hj~r ~~1•, IN THE HIGH COURT OP Ti~N6ANili. AT DL.R ES s;~LLJJ'1 ......... ._ t.. •~ ~- 0. • - 0. l-. f, ~- I ~ •• ,r •

REVISIONLL JURISDICTION (Dli.R ES Sll.Ll~1iM REGISTRY) CRil'UNAL _REVISION NO. 2/1992 ORIGINAL CRIMINAL ClSE NO. 238 OF 1991 OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF BAGJ\.MOYO DISTRICT AT Bil.GAMOYO BEFORE MALEKELA DISTRICT MJ~GISTRLTE THE REPUBLIC ••••.•.....•••.•.•••• PROSECUTOR

VERSUS ABDALLAH KAGITO alias MNYAMWE6I RUBAMA J: . ····-·-~~-...,,-« . ABDALLAH s/o Kl1.GITO alias MNYAMWE2I was, on his own plea &:t' guilty convicted of being in possession of bhang c/s 2 (b) of Cl4H- vation of Noxious Plants (Phohibition) Ordinance, Cap. 134 and senteced to three years iBprisonment, Revisional proceedincs were ordered by this court (Mkude,J.) because the court had not given tho accused the optton of . , / paying fine. On rcadin~ s. 2 (bl of cap 134, howevpr, revisiona• order is called for becnuso thG ·sentence is il_legal~ "·S" 2(b) of cap. 134 provides: 11 Any person who shall:- Consumo, uso or have in his possession any such plant, or any s~bst2.nce obtained therefror.1, or anj compound or ad□ ix.;.;urc thereof, shall be liable." to a fine not exce8ding two thousand shillings or to imprisonment for a perio.d not exceeding twelve monthl; and tho court may order that any such plant or substance in respect of which an offence has been committed shall be destroyed." In light of the just quotPn :-:-:::v_;_zions of the law, the imposed sentence of three years, three ti □ cs the □ aximun sentence provided by the law beine illegal is hereby quashed. In its place the accused is sentenced to such -1:8:CO that would rcsu~'... t to his immediate release fro □ prisons~ It ·s so orde~ed. ' ~-- ........ .' ~ \ ' ) q,._ "~- . Yi~HYf.. RUB' A,J . -~-"'"" Coram~- RUBAMA,J. . 1.7.92 Mrs. Slaa, $tate Attorney for the Republico

JDDGE 1 . 7, 92

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Cultivation of Noxious Plants (Prohibition) Ordinance, Cap. 134 s.2(b)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.