serengeti breweries ltd vs hector sequeiraa 2019 tzca 145 16 may 2019

serengeti breweries ltd vs hector sequeiraa 2019 tzca 145 16 may 2019

The application raises an arguable point of law of sufficient importance, namely whether the CMA and High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the dispute in the absence of a valid work permit, which is apparent on the face of the record. This justifies extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

Citation
serengeti breweries ltd vs hector sequeiraa 2019 tzca 145 16 may 2019
Parties
Applicant: Serengeti Breweries Limited; Respondent: Hector Sequeira
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Employment of Foreigners, Work Permit Requirements
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Serengeti Breweries Limited

Applicant

Hector Sequeira

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application discloses a point of illegality of sufficient importance to justify extension of time
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a valid work permit rendered the employment contract void and ousted the jurisdiction of the CMA and High Court

Ratio Decidendi

The application raises an arguable point of law of sufficient importance, namely whether the CMA and High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the dispute in the absence of a valid work permit, which is apparent on the face of the record. This justifies extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant to lodge a notice of appeal within thirty days from the date of delivery of this ruling
  • Costs to follow the event in the intended appeal