seth japhet vs nicholaus mero 2017 tzca 310 7 august 2017
The application is incompetent due to failure to state grounds for the relief sought in the notice of motion and affidavit as mandatorily required by Rule 48(1) of the Rules.
- Citation
- seth japhet vs nicholaus mero 2017 tzca 310 7 august 2017
- Parties
- Applicant: Seth Japhet; Respondent: Nicholaus M Ero
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- application struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Preliminary Objection, Procedural Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Seth Japhet
Applicant
Nicholaus M Ero
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to state grounds in the notice of motion renders the application incompetent
- 2 Whether citing multiple rules in the notice of motion is a fatal defect
Ratio Decidendi
The application is incompetent due to failure to state grounds for the relief sought in the notice of motion and affidavit as mandatorily required by Rule 48(1) of the Rules.
Court Disposition
application struck out with costs
Orders
- The application is struck out with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment