seth japhet vs nicholaus mero 2017 tzca 310 7 august 2017

seth japhet vs nicholaus mero 2017 tzca 310 7 august 2017

The application is incompetent due to failure to state grounds for the relief sought in the notice of motion and affidavit as mandatorily required by Rule 48(1) of the Rules.

Citation
seth japhet vs nicholaus mero 2017 tzca 310 7 august 2017
Parties
Applicant: Seth Japhet; Respondent: Nicholaus M Ero
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Preliminary Objection, Procedural Requirements
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Seth Japhet

Applicant

Nicholaus M Ero

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether failure to state grounds in the notice of motion renders the application incompetent
  2. 2 Whether citing multiple rules in the notice of motion is a fatal defect

Ratio Decidendi

The application is incompetent due to failure to state grounds for the relief sought in the notice of motion and affidavit as mandatorily required by Rule 48(1) of the Rules.

Court Disposition

application struck out with costs

Orders

  • The application is struck out with costs.